PubMed
NAD+ metabolism and its roles in cellular processes during ageing
Covarrubias AJ, Perrone R, Grozio A, et al. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2021
Compare
Side-by-side observational reports from PeptIQ users. This compares self-reported patterns — not clinical head-to-head trials.
Last reviewed . By the PeptIQ team.
From check-in ratings — separate from side effects logged below. Side effects are logged separately from overall experience. A favorable check-in can still include nausea, fatigue, or injection-site reactions.
Favorable 2% · Mixed 98% · Unfavorable overall 0%
Benefits users selected when logging a favorable or mixed check-in.
Side effects are logged separately from overall experience. A favorable check-in can still include nausea, fatigue, or injection-site reactions.
Median bucket: 5+ mg · Most common: 5+ mg
Reports span 0.1 to ≥ 5 mg (open-ended top bucket)
Anonymized self-reports from PeptIQ users — not prescribing guidance. Buckets group similar logged amounts; open-ended top buckets mean “at least” that dose.
Among repeat reporters, 95% said they felt similar to their last entry, 5% more positive, and 0% more negative.
Overall, repeat reporters leaned more positive than their previous entry.
Median gap between entries: 51 days · Based on 42 repeat reporters
From check-in ratings — separate from side effects logged below. Side effects are logged separately from overall experience. A favorable check-in can still include nausea, fatigue, or injection-site reactions.
Favorable 2% · Mixed 2% · Unfavorable overall 96%
Benefits users selected when logging a favorable or mixed check-in.
Side effects are logged separately from overall experience. A favorable check-in can still include nausea, fatigue, or injection-site reactions.
Median bucket: 50–100 mcg · Most common: 50–100 mcg
Reports span 50–200 mcg
Anonymized self-reports from PeptIQ users — not prescribing guidance. Buckets group similar logged amounts; open-ended top buckets mean “at least” that dose.
Among repeat reporters, 88% said they felt similar to their last entry, 13% more positive, and 0% more negative.
Overall, repeat reporters leaned more positive than their previous entry.
Median gap between entries: 152 days · Based on 24 repeat reporters
Published sources linked on the NAD+ and VIP wiki pages.
PubMed
Covarrubias AJ, Perrone R, Grozio A, et al. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2021
PubMed
Reiten OK, Wilvang MA, Mitchell SJ, et al. J Clin Invest. 2021
PubMed
Yoshino J, Baur JA, Imai SI. Cell Metab. 2018
ClinicalTrials.gov
ClinicalTrials.gov. Clinical trial registry. 2024
PubMed
Bhasin S, Seals D, Migaud M, et al. Endocrine reviews. 2023
PubMed
Verdin E. Science (New York, N.Y.). 2015
PubMed
Imai S, Guarente L. Trends in cell biology. 2014
PubMed
Song Q, Zhou X, Xu K, et al. Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.). 2023
PubMed
Ghatei MA, Takahashi K, Suzuki H, et al. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 2003
PubMed
Delgado M, Chorny A, Gonzalez-Rey E, et al. J Leukoc Biol. 2005
PubMed
Delgado M, Ganea D. Amino Acids. 2013
PubMed
Henning RJ, Sawmiller DR. Cardiovascular Research. 2001
PubMed
Vosko AM, Schroeder A, Loh DH, et al. General and Comparative Endocrinology. 2007
PubMed
Kingsbury MA. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences. 2015
ClinicalTrials.gov
ClinicalTrials.gov. Clinical trial registry. 2024
PubMed
Delgado M, Pozo D, Ganea D. Pharmacological reviews. 2004
PubMed
Jiang W, Wang H, Li YS, et al. Journal of biomedical science. 2016