FDA Drug Label
EGRIFTA (tesamorelin) for injection - Prescribing Information
Theratechnologies, 2010
Egrifta
Tesamorelin (brand: Egrifta SV) is the only FDA-approved GHRH analog, indicated for reduction of excess visceral abdominal fat (lipodystrophy) in HIV-positive adults on antiretroviral therapy. Phase III clinical trials demonstrated significant visceral adipose tissue (VAT) reduction, improved triglyceride profiles, and increased IGF-1 at 2 mg daily dosing. Available by prescription through specialty pharmacies and telehealth.
Overall check-ins
Trackers & reports
Overview
Tesamorelin (brand: Egrifta SV) is the only FDA-approved GHRH analog, indicated for reduction of excess visceral abdominal fat (lipodystrophy) in HIV-positive adults on antiretroviral therapy. Phase III clinical trials demonstrated significant visceral adipose tissue (VAT) reduction, improved triglyceride profiles, and increased IGF-1 at 2 mg daily dosing. Available by prescription through specialty pharmacies and telehealth.
Community
From check-in ratings — separate from side effects logged below. Side effects are logged separately from overall experience. A favorable check-in can still include nausea, fatigue, or injection-site reactions.
Favorable 3% · Mixed 97% · Unfavorable overall 0%
Benefits users selected when logging a favorable or mixed check-in.
Side effects are logged separately from overall experience. A favorable check-in can still include nausea, fatigue, or injection-site reactions.
Median bucket: 1–2 mg · Most common: 1–2 mg
Reports span 0 to ≥ 5 mg (open-ended top bucket)
Anonymized self-reports from PeptIQ users — not prescribing guidance. Buckets group similar logged amounts; open-ended top buckets mean “at least” that dose.
Among repeat reporters, 88% said they felt similar to their last entry, 12% more positive, and 0% more negative.
Overall, repeat reporters leaned more positive than their previous entry.
Median gap between entries: 46 days · Based on 41 repeat reporters
Research
FDA Drug Label
Theratechnologies, 2010
PubMed
Ghigo et al., 2008
ClinicalTrials.gov
ClinicalTrials.gov, 2024
FDA Drug Label
Theratechnologies, 2019
PubMed
Spooner et al., 2012
PubMed
Unknown, 2018
Tools
More ways to learn about Tesamorelin from observational PeptIQ data.
Compare with
Related peptides
Help
This page summarizes 114 anonymized self-reports from PeptIQ users who track Tesamorelin, including commonly reported effects and co-tracked peptides. These are observational patterns, not clinical outcomes.
PeptIQ separates overall check-in ratings (favorable, mixed, or unfavorable) from logged side effects like nausea or fatigue. Users often report benefits and side effects in the same check-in — a high experience score does not mean zero side effects were noted.
6 sources are linked on this page, including PubMed articles, clinical trial registries, and FDA labels where applicable. Citations describe published research — not recommendations.
This wiki does not assess safety or recommend use. Tesamorelin is listed as FDA Approved. Consult a licensed clinician for personal medical decisions.
Research, primarily in animal models, suggests Tesamorelin may have a wide range of therapeutic potentials due to its ability to promote angiogenesis (formation of new blood vessels), stimulate collagen synthesis, and modulate inflammatory responses.
SourceTesamorelin is not approved by the FDA for any human use. There is no legal basis for selling it as a drug, food, or dietary supplement in the United States. The FDA has classified Tesamorelin as a Category 2 bulk drug substance, which explicitly prohibits licensed compounding pharmacies from using it in compounded medications.
SourceThe safety and effectiveness of Tesamorelin have not been thoroughly evaluated in humans through rigorous clinical trials. This lack of human data means that safe dosages, short-term side effects, and long-term health consequences are largely unknown.
SourceWhile there are over 200 published studies on Tesamorelin, the vast majority are animal or in vitro (cell) studies. These preclinical studies consistently show positive results across various tissue types. However, there is a significant lack of comprehensive human clinical trial data.
Source