FDA Drug Label
VYLEESI (bremelanotide injection) for subcutaneous use - Prescribing Information
AMAG, 2019
Bremelanotide / Vyleesi
PT-141 (bremelanotide, brand: Vyleesi) is FDA-approved for hypoactive sexual desire disorder (HSDD) in premenopausal women. Unlike PDE5 inhibitors, PT-141 acts centrally on melanocortin receptors in the CNS to increase sexual desire and arousal rather than acting peripherally on blood flow. Administered as a subcutaneous autoinjector 45 minutes before anticipated sexual activity. Banned from 503A compounding pharmacies.
Overall check-ins
Trackers & reports
Overview
PT-141 (bremelanotide, brand: Vyleesi) is FDA-approved for hypoactive sexual desire disorder (HSDD) in premenopausal women. Unlike PDE5 inhibitors, PT-141 acts centrally on melanocortin receptors in the CNS to increase sexual desire and arousal rather than acting peripherally on blood flow. Administered as a subcutaneous autoinjector 45 minutes before anticipated sexual activity. Banned from 503A compounding pharmacies.
Community
From check-in ratings — separate from side effects logged below. Side effects are logged separately from overall experience. A favorable check-in can still include nausea, fatigue, or injection-site reactions.
Favorable 3% · Mixed 2% · Unfavorable overall 95%
Benefits users selected when logging a favorable or mixed check-in.
Side effects are logged separately from overall experience. A favorable check-in can still include nausea, fatigue, or injection-site reactions.
Median bucket: 2–3 mg · Most common: 2–3 mg
Reports span 0.1–3 mg
Anonymized self-reports from PeptIQ users — not prescribing guidance. Buckets group similar logged amounts; open-ended top buckets mean “at least” that dose.
Among repeat reporters, 87% said they felt similar to their last entry, 13% more positive, and 0% more negative.
Overall, repeat reporters leaned more positive than their previous entry.
Median gap between entries: 100 days · Based on 23 repeat reporters
Research
FDA Drug Label
AMAG, 2019
PubMed
Kingsberg et al., 2019
ClinicalTrials.gov
ClinicalTrials.gov, 2024
PubMed
Pettigrew et al., 2021
PubMed
Burton et al., 2022
Tools
More ways to learn about PT-141 from observational PeptIQ data.
Related peptides
Help
This page summarizes 27 anonymized self-reports from PeptIQ users who track PT-141, including commonly reported effects and co-tracked peptides. These are observational patterns, not clinical outcomes.
PeptIQ separates overall check-in ratings (favorable, mixed, or unfavorable) from logged side effects like nausea or fatigue. Users often report benefits and side effects in the same check-in — a high experience score does not mean zero side effects were noted.
5 sources are linked on this page, including PubMed articles, clinical trial registries, and FDA labels where applicable. Citations describe published research — not recommendations.
This wiki does not assess safety or recommend use. PT-141 is listed as FDA Approved. Consult a licensed clinician for personal medical decisions.
Research, primarily in animal models, suggests PT-141 may have a wide range of therapeutic potentials due to its ability to promote angiogenesis (formation of new blood vessels), stimulate collagen synthesis, and modulate inflammatory responses.
SourcePT-141 is not approved by the FDA for any human use. There is no legal basis for selling it as a drug, food, or dietary supplement in the United States. The FDA has classified PT-141 as a Category 2 bulk drug substance, which explicitly prohibits licensed compounding pharmacies from using it in compounded medications.
SourceThe safety and effectiveness of PT-141 have not been thoroughly evaluated in humans through rigorous clinical trials. This lack of human data means that safe dosages, short-term side effects, and long-term health consequences are largely unknown.
SourceWhile there are over 200 published studies on PT-141, the vast majority are animal or in vitro (cell) studies. These preclinical studies consistently show positive results across various tissue types. However, there is a significant lack of comprehensive human clinical trial data.
Source