Compare

MOTS-c vs TB-500 Fragment

Side-by-side observational reports from PeptIQ users. This compares self-reported patterns — not clinical head-to-head trials.

Last reviewed . By the PeptIQ team.

Observational reporting only — not medical advice. Does not recommend doses, protocols, or treatments.

MOTS-c

113 community reports

Overall experience

From check-in ratings — separate from side effects logged below. Side effects are logged separately from overall experience. A favorable check-in can still include nausea, fatigue, or injection-site reactions.

Favorable 18% · Mixed 2% · Unfavorable overall 80%

Most reported benefits

Benefits users selected when logging a favorable or mixed check-in.

Appetite
230
Energy
47
Recovery
3
Mood
2
Cognition
1

Most logged side effects

Side effects are logged separately from overall experience. A favorable check-in can still include nausea, fatigue, or injection-site reactions.

Injection site irritation
191

Self-reported dose per injection

Median bucket: 2–3 mg · Most common: 5+ mg

Reports span 0.01 to ≥ 5 mg (open-ended top bucket)

0.01–0.025 mg
4
0.1–0.2 mg
1
0.2–0.4 mg
8
0.4–0.6 mg
11
0.6–1 mg
8
1–2 mg
42
2–3 mg
45
3–5 mg
7
5+ mg
107

Anonymized self-reports from PeptIQ users — not prescribing guidance. Buckets group similar logged amounts; open-ended top buckets mean “at least” that dose.

How repeat users are trending

Among repeat reporters, 56% said they felt similar to their last entry, 31% more positive, and 13% more negative.

Overall, repeat reporters leaned more positive than their previous entry.

Median gap between entries: 44 days · Based on 45 repeat reporters

TB-500 Fragment

26 community reports

Overall experience

From check-in ratings — separate from side effects logged below. Side effects are logged separately from overall experience. A favorable check-in can still include nausea, fatigue, or injection-site reactions.

Favorable 3% · Mixed 97% · Unfavorable overall 0%

Most reported benefits

Benefits users selected when logging a favorable or mixed check-in.

Recovery
176

Most logged side effects

Side effects are logged separately from overall experience. A favorable check-in can still include nausea, fatigue, or injection-site reactions.

Injection site irritation
171

Self-reported dose per injection

Median bucket: 2+ mg · Most common: 2+ mg

Reports span 1 to ≥ 2 mg (open-ended top bucket)

1–2 mg
59
2+ mg
117

Anonymized self-reports from PeptIQ users — not prescribing guidance. Buckets group similar logged amounts; open-ended top buckets mean “at least” that dose.

How repeat users are trending

Among repeat reporters, 79% said they felt similar to their last entry, 21% more positive, and 0% more negative.

Overall, repeat reporters leaned more positive than their previous entry.

Median gap between entries: 188 days · Based on 24 repeat reporters

Sources (9)

Published sources linked on the MOTS-c and TB-500 Fragment wiki pages.

  1. PubMed

    MOTS-c is an ancient mitochondrial-encoded regulator of metabolic homeostasis

    Lee C, Zeng J, Drew BG, et al. Cell Metab. 2015

    Source
    Wiki study page →
  2. PubMed

    MOTS-c: A mitochondrial-encoded peptide regulating muscle function

    Reynolds JC, Lai RW, Woodhead JST, et al. Nat Commun. 2021

    Source
    Wiki study page →
  3. PubMed

    MOTS-c improves insulin sensitivity in mice and humans

    Kim SJ, Xiao J, Wan J, et al. Aging Cell. 2019

    Source
    Wiki study page →
  4. ClinicalTrials.gov

    MOTS-c metabolic studies on ClinicalTrials.gov

    ClinicalTrials.gov. Clinical trial registry. 2024

    Source
    Wiki study page →
  5. PubMed

    MOTS-c: A promising mitochondrial-derived peptide for therapeutic exploitation

    Zheng Y, Wei Z, Wang T. Frontiers in endocrinology. 2023

    Source
    Wiki study page →
  6. PubMed

    MOTS-c: A novel mitochondrial-derived peptide regulating muscle and fat metabolism

    Lee C, Kim KH, Cohen P. Free radical biology & medicine. 2016

    Source
    Wiki study page →
  7. PubMed

    Thymosin beta4: a multi-functional regenerative peptide (review)

    Goldstein AL, Kleinman HK. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2012

    Source
    Wiki study page →
  8. PubMed

    Thymosin beta 4 and wound healing: a multifunctional peptide

    Goldstein AL, Kleinman HK. Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2010

    Source
    Wiki study page →
  9. PubMed

    Safety and Efficacy of Approved and Unapproved Peptide Therapies for Musculoskeletal Injuries and Athletic Performance

    Mendias CL, Awan TM. Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.). 2026

    Source
    Wiki study page →