@moreplatesmoredates

2 posts audited · 8 claims analysed

Instagram profile

Science evidence grade

88%High evidence grade

Based on 8 claims across 2 audits

SupportedOverstatedMisleadingNo Evidence

7

Supported

88%

0

Overstated

0%

0

Misleading

0%

1

No Evidence

13%

Share this evidence grade

Claim-level evidence grades — not a character judgment. Methodology · Right of reply · Leaderboards

What @moreplatesmoredates claims actually are

We separate claims into three buckets: backed by evidence, factually incorrect, and grey — like animal-only findings sold as human fact (e.g. BPC-157 “fixes Achilles” from rat studies).

Evidence-based

88%

7 claims

Claims that align with published human or clinical evidence at the stated strength.

Ex: “Semaglutide can reduce body weight in adults with obesity” — supported by large RCTs.

Factually incorrect

0%

0 claims

Claims that conflict with the evidence, invent certainty, or omit critical safety/context in a misleading way.

Ex: “Peptides have no side effects” — contradicts known adverse-event profiles.

Grey / overstated

13%

1 claim

Plausible direction but wrong certainty — animal-only data sold as human fact, dose/effect overstated, or no adequate published support yet.

Ex: “BPC-157 fixes Achilles tears” — often rests on rodent tendon models, not proven human Achilles repair trials.

Evidence mix

Share of audited claims in each bucket

Loading…
BackedIncorrectGrey

Verdict detail

Grey splits into overstated (wrong certainty) vs no published support

Loading…

Claims over time

Stacked by bucket as audits land — plus the running evidence grade

Loading…

Gold line = running science evidence grade (Supported + ½ Overstated ÷ total claims).

Audit history(2 posts)

Post thumbnail
Supported
Audited Jul 10, 2026·21 days ago·View source

➢ Full Article: https://moreplatesmoredates.com/will-melanotan-ii-permanently-darken-your-skin/ ———————————— ➢ https://www.gorillamind.com/?atid=7 (Gorilla Mind - My Fully Loaded Nootropic Formula) ➢ https://mvmt.cc/moreplatesmoredates (MVMT Watches & Sunglasses) discount code "DC15" for 15% off and free shipping on your entire order ➢ Vertical Diet Download: http://bit.ly/2JmpTGv ➢ Blood Work: https://moreplatesmoredates.com/blood-test ———————————— ➢ Get My "20 Underground Bodybuilding Secrets You Won't Find On Google" E-Book 100% FREE: http://bit.ly/2umL5oE ———————————— Follow Me On ———————————— BLOG: https://moreplatesmoredates.com/ YOUTUBE: https://www.youtube.com/moreplatesmoredates INSTAGRAM: https://www.instagram.com/moreplates_moredates/ IGTV: https://www.instagram.com/moreplates_moredates/channel/ FACEBOOK: https://www.facebook.com/moreplatesmoredates/ SNAPCHAT: https://www.snapchat.com/add/derek-fit TWITTER: https://twitter.com/Derek_Fitness BITCHUTE: https://www.bitchute.com/moreplatesmoredates/ ———————————— Subscribe To The More Plates More Dates Podcast ———————————— PODCAST: https://itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/more-plates-more-dates/id1424766141?mt=2series ———————————— #MorePlatesMoreDates #Tanning #MelanotanII ————————————

Both claims regarding Melanotan 2's permanent or semi-permanent effects on skin pigmentation lack supporting evidence in the peer-reviewed scientific literature. No human clinical trials, animal studies, or mechanistic research was found that directly addresses either claim. While Melanotan 2 is known to stimulate melanin production acutely (a mechanism documented in limited preclinical work), the specific claims about persistence of pigmentation changes after discontinuation and UV cessation remain unsupported by any available published data. The FDA's regulatory warnings on Melanotan products focus on safety and illegal marketing—not efficacy or permanence of effects.

Post thumbnail
⚠️ Overstated
Posted May 20, 2021·about 5 years ago·View post

Cutting Edge Injury Recovery Protocols

Three of six claims (TB-500 angiogenesis, MK-677 as ghrelin mimetic, ghrelin and sympathetic drive) are supported by peer-reviewed literature or registered clinical trials. Three claims (BPC-157 angiogenesis, EPO angiogenesis via JAK-STAT, EPO as separate anabolic growth factor) found no supporting evidence in available abstracts or trial registries. The post's direction on supported claims is accurate, but the creator has not provided citations, and evidence for angiogenic properties is limited to preclinical (animal model) studies — human orthopaedic data are explicitly lacking per the 2026 Mayfield et al. review, which cautions that 'significant research regarding the safety and efficacy of these therapeutic methods is required before definitive recommendations can be made.'

Audit another post from @moreplatesmoredates

Paste their social post link to add a new audit

New audit