Neurological & CognitiveInvestigational (Phase 2)C

ARA-290

Cibinetide

Non-erythropoietic peptide studied for neuropathic and inflammatory indications.

Observational report only — live community data. Not medical advice. Does not recommend doses, protocols, or treatments.
Studies cited
4
Research grade
C
Experience
70

Overall check-ins

Activity
100

Trackers & reports

Overview

About ARA-290

Non-erythropoietic peptide studied for neuropathic and inflammatory indications.

Category
Neurological & Cognitive
Regulatory status
Investigational (Phase 2)
Also known as
Cibinetide
Self-reports
6

Community

What 6 users report

6 community reports

Overall experience

From check-in ratings — separate from side effects logged below. Side effects are logged separately from overall experience. A favorable check-in can still include nausea, fatigue, or injection-site reactions.

Favorable 33% · Mixed 67% · Unfavorable overall 0%

Most reported benefits

Benefits users selected when logging a favorable or mixed check-in.

Appetite
6

Most logged side effects

Side effects are logged separately from overall experience. A favorable check-in can still include nausea, fatigue, or injection-site reactions.

Injection site irritation
4

Self-reported dose per injection

Median bucket: 2+ mg · Most common: 2+ mg

Reports span 2 to ≥ 2 mg (open-ended top bucket)

2+ mg
6

Anonymized self-reports from PeptIQ users — not prescribing guidance. Buckets group similar logged amounts; open-ended top buckets mean “at least” that dose.

Commonly stacked with

Research

Cited research (3)

PubMed

ARA 290, a nonerythropoietic peptide engineered from erythropoietin, improves neuropathic symptoms in patients with sarcoidosis

Dahan et al., 2013

Source
Wiki study page →

Tools

Explore more

Explore

More ways to learn about ARA-290 from observational PeptIQ data.

Related peptides

Help

Frequently asked

What do PeptIQ users report about ARA-290?

This page summarizes 6 anonymized self-reports from PeptIQ users who track ARA-290, including commonly reported effects and co-tracked peptides. These are observational patterns, not clinical outcomes.

How do side effects relate to overall experience for ARA-290?

PeptIQ separates overall check-in ratings (favorable, mixed, or unfavorable) from logged side effects like nausea or fatigue. Users often report benefits and side effects in the same check-in — a high experience score does not mean zero side effects were noted.

What research is cited for ARA-290?

3 sources are linked on this page, including PubMed articles, clinical trial registries, and FDA labels where applicable. Citations describe published research — not recommendations.

Is ARA-290 safe to use?

This wiki does not assess safety or recommend use. ARA-290 is listed as Investigational (Phase 2). Consult a licensed clinician for personal medical decisions.

What are the purported benefits and uses of ARA-290?

Research, primarily in animal models, suggests ARA-290 may have a wide range of therapeutic potentials due to its ability to promote angiogenesis (formation of new blood vessels), stimulate collagen synthesis, and modulate inflammatory responses.

Source

What is the legal status of ARA-290?

ARA-290 is not approved by the FDA for any human use. There is no legal basis for selling it as a drug, food, or dietary supplement in the United States. The FDA has classified ARA-290 as a Category 2 bulk drug substance, which explicitly prohibits licensed compounding pharmacies from using it in compounded medications.

Source

What are the known or theoretical side effects and risks of ARA-290?

The safety and effectiveness of ARA-290 have not been thoroughly evaluated in humans through rigorous clinical trials. This lack of human data means that safe dosages, short-term side effects, and long-term health consequences are largely unknown.

Source

What is the current state of research on ARA-290?

While there are over 200 published studies on ARA-290, the vast majority are animal or in vitro (cell) studies. These preclinical studies consistently show positive results across various tissue types. However, there is a significant lack of comprehensive human clinical trial data.

Source