Public COA audit
BPC-157 · TB-500
Audited July 28, 2026
Several fields check out, but we found issues worth reviewing before you rely on this document.
- Legitimacy
- 72
- Confidence
- 83%
- Panels
- 2/7
- Purity (printed)
- 99.36%
Document details
Fields extracted from the certificate — not order or payment data.
- Batch / lot
- B-4339222-P
- Identity method
- UPLC/MS
- Sample date
- 2026-06-22
- Issue date
- 2026-06-22
7-panel checklist
Had data + good, had data + bad, reported without pass/fail, or missing. Missing lowers thoroughness — you decide whether that panel matters; PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
2 of 7 present · 2 passed · 0 failed · 0 reported · 5 missing
Missing is a thoroughness gap — not automatically bad. PeptIQ’s legitimacy score still weighs panel coverage; you can down-weight panels that don’t matter for your use case.
Identity
Tested · passed · core
Compound identity confirmed (e.g. HPLC, mass spec).
BPC-157 confirmed; TB-500 confirmed
Purity
Tested · passed · core
Reported purity percentage for the analyte.
BPC-157: 99.36%; TB-500: 99.12%
Heavy metals
Not on this COA
Lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, or similar limits.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Microbial
Not on this COA
Bioburden / microbial limits testing.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Endotoxin
Not on this COA · core
LAL or chromogenic endotoxin assay.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Sterility
Not on this COA
Sterility testing where applicable.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Residual solvent / water
Not on this COA
Residual solvents or water content limits.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
How to read this
Had data · good
Panel present with a pass (or clear acceptance).
Had data · bad
Panel present with a fail — a concrete quality signal.
Had data · unclear
Value reported without an explicit pass/fail mark.
Missing
Not on this certificate. Lowers thoroughness; you decide if that panel matters for your use case. PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
Findings
Evidence-linked observations from this audit.
High purity results
BPC-157 at 99.36% and TB-500 at 99.12% purity are within normal range for research-grade peptides and meet specification (≥98%).
Identity confirmed by UPLC/MS
Both compounds confirmed by UPLC/MS with chromatograms and mass spectra provided. Molecular weights and formulas match expected values.
Identical lot number for two different compounds
Both BPC-157 and TB-500 share the same lot number (B-4339222-P), which is unusual. Typically, different compounds receive distinct lot numbers even when analyzed together.
Dates are current and consistent
Lab received date and analysis date both 06/22/2026, which is before today (2026-07-28). Same-day analysis is plausible for UPLC/MS.
Lab verification not independently confirmed
Horizon Analytical is listed with contact email and verification URL (horizonanalytical.com), but independent verification of this lab's existence and accreditation was not performed in this audit.
Limited testing scope
Only identity and purity panels present. No heavy metals, microbial, endotoxin, sterility, or residual solvent/water testing. This is common for basic purity COAs but limits comprehensive quality assurance.
Professional presentation
Document is well-formatted with clear tables, chromatograms, mass spectra, QR codes for validation, and signature from named chemist (Aleksey Yevtodiyenko PhD).
PeptIQ COA reports analyze document content and publicly verifiable lab signals. They are educational and not a guarantee of product quality, legality, or safety. Always consult a qualified professional before making health decisions. We never publish purchase prices, shipping details, or uploader identity.