Public COA audit
Tesamorelin
Audited July 28, 2026
Missing panels or key metadata — not enough evidence to treat this as a full certificate.
- Legitimacy
- 45
- Confidence
- 82%
- Panels
- 1/7
Document details
Fields extracted from the certificate — not order or payment data.
- Batch / lot
- TES202601
- Issue date
- 2026-01-19
7-panel checklist
Had data + good, had data + bad, reported without pass/fail, or missing. Missing lowers thoroughness — you decide whether that panel matters; PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
1 of 7 present · 0 passed · 0 failed · 1 reported · 6 missing
Missing is a thoroughness gap — not automatically bad. PeptIQ’s legitimacy score still weighs panel coverage; you can down-weight panels that don’t matter for your use case.
Identity
Not on this COA · core
Compound identity confirmed (e.g. HPLC, mass spec).
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Purity
Not on this COA · core
Reported purity percentage for the analyte.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Heavy metals
Tested · result on file
Lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, or similar limits.
All Class 1 metals below detection limits; trace amounts of Barium (0.37950 µg), Copper (0.42650 µg), Aluminum (2.1450 µg), Calcium (14.80000 µg), Magnesium (5.500 µg), Sodium (63.500 µg), Zinc (1.5750 µg)
Microbial
Not on this COA
Bioburden / microbial limits testing.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Endotoxin
Not on this COA · core
LAL or chromogenic endotoxin assay.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Sterility
Not on this COA
Sterility testing where applicable.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Residual solvent / water
Not on this COA
Residual solvents or water content limits.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
How to read this
Had data · good
Panel present with a pass (or clear acceptance).
Had data · bad
Panel present with a fail — a concrete quality signal.
Had data · unclear
Value reported without an explicit pass/fail mark.
Missing
Not on this certificate. Lowers thoroughness; you decide if that panel matters for your use case. PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
Findings
Evidence-linked observations from this audit.
No purity testing
COA contains only heavy metals panel; no HPLC, MS, or other purity/identity testing for the peptide itself
No identity confirmation
No mass spectrometry, amino acid analysis, or other identity verification method present
Incomplete testing suite
Only heavy metals testing performed; missing purity, identity, microbial, endotoxin, sterility, and residual solvent/water panels
Batch number present
Client SID TES202601 and internal Sample ID SPL-2740 both documented
No sample receipt date
Published date 2026-01-19 is present but no sample collection or receipt date documented
Lab identification complete
TrustPointe Analytics LLC with full address, contact info, and verification URL provided
Professional presentation
Document has proper formatting, signatures, QR code for verification, and dual approval structure
PeptIQ COA reports analyze document content and publicly verifiable lab signals. They are educational and not a guarantee of product quality, legality, or safety. Always consult a qualified professional before making health decisions. We never publish purchase prices, shipping details, or uploader identity.