Public COA audit

BPC-157 · TB-500

Audited July 28, 2026

Mostly consistent, with concerns

Several fields check out, but we found issues worth reviewing before you rely on this document.

Legitimacy
92
Confidence
88%
Panels
2/7
Purity (printed)
99.64%

Document details

Fields extracted from the certificate — not order or payment data.

Batch / lot
BB202604
Identity method
HPLC with retention time and spectral matching
Issue date
2026-03-27

7-panel checklist

Had data + good, had data + bad, reported without pass/fail, or missing. Missing lowers thoroughness — you decide whether that panel matters; PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.

2 of 7 present · 2 passed · 0 failed · 0 reported · 5 missing

Missing is a thoroughness gap — not automatically bad. PeptIQ’s legitimacy score still weighs panel coverage; you can down-weight panels that don’t matter for your use case.

  • Identity

    Tested · passed · core

    Compound identity confirmed (e.g. HPLC, mass spec).

    ID by RT: 1.00, ID by Spectral: 1000

  • Purity

    Tested · passed · core

    Reported purity percentage for the analyte.

    99.565-99.680%

  • Heavy metals

    Not on this COA

    Lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, or similar limits.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Microbial

    Not on this COA

    Bioburden / microbial limits testing.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Endotoxin

    Not on this COA · core

    LAL or chromogenic endotoxin assay.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Sterility

    Not on this COA

    Sterility testing where applicable.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Residual solvent / water

    Not on this COA

    Residual solvents or water content limits.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

How to read this

Had data · good

Panel present with a pass (or clear acceptance).

Had data · bad

Panel present with a fail — a concrete quality signal.

Had data · unclear

Value reported without an explicit pass/fail mark.

Missing

Not on this certificate. Lowers thoroughness; you decide if that panel matters for your use case. PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.

Findings

Evidence-linked observations from this audit.

  • High purity confirmed

    Blend purity ranges 99.565-99.680% across four vials, consistent with quality research peptides

  • Dual identity confirmation

    Both BPC-157 and TB-500 confirmed via retention time (1.00) and spectral matching (1000), with coelution controls and system suitability checks

  • Batch number present

    Client SID BB202604 clearly stated

  • Sample date not stated

    Published date 2026-03-27 is present, but no explicit sample receipt or collection date provided

  • Lab details complete

    TrustPointe Analytics LLC with full address (Dorr, MI), phone, email, website, and verification URL with key HNYYJXP6A47F

  • Limited testing scope

    Only identity and purity panels performed; no heavy metals, microbial, endotoxin, sterility, or residual solvent testing

  • Professional presentation

    Well-formatted with QR code, signatures from President and Managing Director, and photo attachment of tested vials

PeptIQ COA reports analyze document content and publicly verifiable lab signals. They are educational and not a guarantee of product quality, legality, or safety. Always consult a qualified professional before making health decisions. We never publish purchase prices, shipping details, or uploader identity.