Public COA audit

SS-31

Audited July 29, 2026

Incomplete documentation

Missing panels or key metadata — not enough evidence to treat this as a full certificate.

Legitimacy
45
Confidence
82%
Panels
1/7

Document details

Fields extracted from the certificate — not order or payment data.

Batch / lot
SS202602
Issue date
2026-05-24

7-panel checklist

Had data + good, had data + bad, reported without pass/fail, or missing. Missing lowers thoroughness — you decide whether that panel matters; PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.

1 of 7 present · 0 passed · 0 failed · 1 reported · 6 missing

Missing is a thoroughness gap — not automatically bad. PeptIQ’s legitimacy score still weighs panel coverage; you can down-weight panels that don’t matter for your use case.

  • Identity

    Not on this COA · core

    Compound identity confirmed (e.g. HPLC, mass spec).

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Purity

    Not on this COA · core

    Reported purity percentage for the analyte.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Heavy metals

    Tested · result on file

    Lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, or similar limits.

    Multiple elements tested via EPA 208/245 methods; Class 1-3 metals all below or near detection limits

  • Microbial

    Not on this COA

    Bioburden / microbial limits testing.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Endotoxin

    Not on this COA · core

    LAL or chromogenic endotoxin assay.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Sterility

    Not on this COA

    Sterility testing where applicable.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Residual solvent / water

    Not on this COA

    Residual solvents or water content limits.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

How to read this

Had data · good

Panel present with a pass (or clear acceptance).

Had data · bad

Panel present with a fail — a concrete quality signal.

Had data · unclear

Value reported without an explicit pass/fail mark.

Missing

Not on this certificate. Lowers thoroughness; you decide if that panel matters for your use case. PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.

Findings

Evidence-linked observations from this audit.

  • No purity testing

    This COA contains only heavy metals/elemental analysis. No HPLC, MS, or other purity/identity testing is present for the peptide SS-31.

  • No identity confirmation

    No mass spectrometry, NMR, or other identity verification method is documented. Cannot confirm the sample is actually SS-31.

  • Incomplete testing suite

    Only heavy metals panel is present. Missing: purity (HPLC), identity (MS), microbial, endotoxin, sterility, and residual solvents/water content.

  • No sample/receipt date

    Published date is 2026-05-24, but no sample receipt or testing date is documented.

  • Lab information present

    TrustPointe Analytics LLC with full contact details, verification URL (TrustPointeLIMS.com), and verification key AU3JRD37APG8.

  • Batch/lot number present

    Client SID SS202602 and internal sample ID SPL-3614 are documented.

  • Professional formatting

    Document has professional layout, signatures from Ashlee Lust (President) and Joshua Lust (Managing Director), and consistent branding.

PeptIQ COA reports analyze document content and publicly verifiable lab signals. They are educational and not a guarantee of product quality, legality, or safety. Always consult a qualified professional before making health decisions. We never publish purchase prices, shipping details, or uploader identity.