Public COA audit

Retatrutide

Audited July 29, 2026

Incomplete documentation

Missing panels or key metadata — not enough evidence to treat this as a full certificate.

Legitimacy
45
Confidence
82%
Panels
1/7

Document details

Fields extracted from the certificate — not order or payment data.

Batch / lot
RT202605
Issue date
2026-06-05

7-panel checklist

Had data + good, had data + bad, reported without pass/fail, or missing. Missing lowers thoroughness — you decide whether that panel matters; PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.

1 of 7 present · 0 passed · 0 failed · 1 reported · 6 missing

Missing is a thoroughness gap — not automatically bad. PeptIQ’s legitimacy score still weighs panel coverage; you can down-weight panels that don’t matter for your use case.

  • Identity

    Not on this COA · core

    Compound identity confirmed (e.g. HPLC, mass spec).

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Purity

    Not on this COA · core

    Reported purity percentage for the analyte.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Heavy metals

    Tested · result on file

    Lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, or similar limits.

    All Class 1 metals below detection limits; trace Barium (0.365 µg), Copper (0.392 µg), Aluminum (1.44 µg), Sodium (415 µg)

  • Microbial

    Not on this COA

    Bioburden / microbial limits testing.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Endotoxin

    Not on this COA · core

    LAL or chromogenic endotoxin assay.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Sterility

    Not on this COA

    Sterility testing where applicable.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Residual solvent / water

    Not on this COA

    Residual solvents or water content limits.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

How to read this

Had data · good

Panel present with a pass (or clear acceptance).

Had data · bad

Panel present with a fail — a concrete quality signal.

Had data · unclear

Value reported without an explicit pass/fail mark.

Missing

Not on this certificate. Lowers thoroughness; you decide if that panel matters for your use case. PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.

Findings

Evidence-linked observations from this audit.

  • No purity testing

    This COA contains only heavy metals testing. No HPLC, MS, or other purity/identity analysis is present. For a peptide product, purity and identity confirmation are essential.

  • No identity confirmation

    No mass spectrometry, NMR, or other identity verification method is documented. Cannot confirm the sample is actually Retatrutide.

  • Incomplete testing suite

    Only heavy metals panel present. Missing: purity (HPLC), identity (MS), microbial, endotoxin, sterility, and residual solvents/water content.

  • No sample receipt date

    COA shows publication date (2026-06-05) but no sample collection or receipt date, making traceability incomplete.

  • Lab information present

    TrustPointe Analytics LLC with full address, contact details, and verification URL provided.

  • Batch/lot number present

    Client SID RT202605 and internal Sample ID SPL-3915 both documented.

PeptIQ COA reports analyze document content and publicly verifiable lab signals. They are educational and not a guarantee of product quality, legality, or safety. Always consult a qualified professional before making health decisions. We never publish purchase prices, shipping details, or uploader identity.