Public COA audit

Retatrutide

Audited July 28, 2026

Mostly consistent, with concerns

Several fields check out, but we found issues worth reviewing before you rely on this document.

Legitimacy
92
Confidence
88%
Panels
2/7
Purity (printed)
99.62%

Document details

Fields extracted from the certificate — not order or payment data.

Batch / lot
RP202601
Identity method
HPLC with retention time and spectral matching
Issue date
2025-12-22

7-panel checklist

Had data + good, had data + bad, reported without pass/fail, or missing. Missing lowers thoroughness — you decide whether that panel matters; PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.

2 of 7 present · 2 passed · 0 failed · 0 reported · 5 missing

Missing is a thoroughness gap — not automatically bad. PeptIQ’s legitimacy score still weighs panel coverage; you can down-weight panels that don’t matter for your use case.

  • Identity

    Tested · passed · core

    Compound identity confirmed (e.g. HPLC, mass spec).

    RT match 0.99-1.00, Spectral match 1000

  • Purity

    Tested · passed · core

    Reported purity percentage for the analyte.

    99.6-99.63%

  • Heavy metals

    Not on this COA

    Lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, or similar limits.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Microbial

    Not on this COA

    Bioburden / microbial limits testing.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Endotoxin

    Not on this COA · core

    LAL or chromogenic endotoxin assay.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Sterility

    Not on this COA

    Sterility testing where applicable.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Residual solvent / water

    Not on this COA

    Residual solvents or water content limits.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

How to read this

Had data · good

Panel present with a pass (or clear acceptance).

Had data · bad

Panel present with a fail — a concrete quality signal.

Had data · unclear

Value reported without an explicit pass/fail mark.

Missing

Not on this certificate. Lowers thoroughness; you decide if that panel matters for your use case. PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.

Findings

Evidence-linked observations from this audit.

  • High purity across all samples

    Three vials tested with purity 99.619%, 99.600%, and 99.633% - consistent and within normal range for research peptides

  • Identity confirmed by multiple methods

    Retention time matching (0.99-1.00) and spectral matching (1000) confirm compound identity

  • Verifiable laboratory with contact information

    TrustPointe Analytics LLC provides full address, phone, email, website, and verification URL with key HBUPKDUJD7C5

  • Issue date within acceptable range

    Published 2025-12-22, which is before the current date of 2026-07-28

  • Client sample ID provided

    Client SID RP202601 with three sub-samples (SPL-2644, SPL-2644-S01, SPL-2644-S02)

  • Limited testing scope

    Only identity and purity testing performed; no heavy metals, microbial, endotoxin, sterility, or residual solvent testing

  • Sample date not specified

    No explicit sample collection or receipt date provided on the COA

  • Professional presentation

    Document includes signatures, QR code, photo attachment of tested vials, and proper formatting

PeptIQ COA reports analyze document content and publicly verifiable lab signals. They are educational and not a guarantee of product quality, legality, or safety. Always consult a qualified professional before making health decisions. We never publish purchase prices, shipping details, or uploader identity.