Public COA audit
NAD+ · Nicotinamide Adenine Dinucleotide
Audited July 28, 2026
Several fields check out, but we found issues worth reviewing before you rely on this document.
- Legitimacy
- 72
- Confidence
- 85%
- Panels
- 1/7
Document details
Fields extracted from the certificate — not order or payment data.
- Batch / lot
- NDU202601
- Issue date
- 2026-01-28
7-panel checklist
Had data + good, had data + bad, reported without pass/fail, or missing. Missing lowers thoroughness — you decide whether that panel matters; PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
1 of 7 present · 0 passed · 0 failed · 1 reported · 6 missing
Missing is a thoroughness gap — not automatically bad. PeptIQ’s legitimacy score still weighs panel coverage; you can down-weight panels that don’t matter for your use case.
Identity
Not on this COA · core
Compound identity confirmed (e.g. HPLC, mass spec).
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Purity
Not on this COA · core
Reported purity percentage for the analyte.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Heavy metals
Not on this COA
Lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, or similar limits.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Microbial
Not on this COA
Bioburden / microbial limits testing.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Endotoxin
Tested · result on file · core
LAL or chromogenic endotoxin assay.
12.4 EU/mL
Sterility
Not on this COA
Sterility testing where applicable.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Residual solvent / water
Not on this COA
Residual solvents or water content limits.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
How to read this
Had data · good
Panel present with a pass (or clear acceptance).
Had data · bad
Panel present with a fail — a concrete quality signal.
Had data · unclear
Value reported without an explicit pass/fail mark.
Missing
Not on this certificate. Lowers thoroughness; you decide if that panel matters for your use case. PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
Findings
Evidence-linked observations from this audit.
Single panel only
This COA contains only endotoxin testing (USP <85>). No identity confirmation (HPLC/MS), purity analysis, heavy metals, microbial, sterility, or residual solvent testing is present. This is a specialized endotoxin-only report, not a comprehensive COA.
No purity data
No HPLC or other purity measurement is provided. Cannot verify compound purity or identity.
No identity confirmation
No mass spectrometry, NMR, or other identity verification method is documented. The compound identity (NAD+) is stated but not analytically confirmed.
Verifiable lab
TrustPointe Analytics LLC is a real laboratory in Dorr, MI with verification URL and QR code provided (Key=6ET3JZ34KAS7).
Issue date valid
Published date 2026-01-28 is before today (2026-07-28) and is reasonable.
Batch number present
Client SID NDU202601 and internal sample ID SPL-2932 are documented.
Endotoxin result interpretation unclear
Result shows 12.4 EU/mL with USP limit stated as 5 EU/kg/hr, but no explicit pass/fail determination is provided. The units differ (EU/mL vs EU/kg/hr), making direct comparison difficult without additional context about dosing.
Professional formatting
Document has professional layout with signatures, QR code, contact information, and proper lab letterhead.
PeptIQ COA reports analyze document content and publicly verifiable lab signals. They are educational and not a guarantee of product quality, legality, or safety. Always consult a qualified professional before making health decisions. We never publish purchase prices, shipping details, or uploader identity.