Public COA audit

MOTS-C

Audited July 29, 2026

Mostly consistent, with concerns

Several fields check out, but we found issues worth reviewing before you rely on this document.

Legitimacy
72
Confidence
83%
Panels
1/7

Document details

Fields extracted from the certificate — not order or payment data.

Batch / lot
MC202605
Issue date
2026-06-23

7-panel checklist

Had data + good, had data + bad, reported without pass/fail, or missing. Missing lowers thoroughness — you decide whether that panel matters; PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.

1 of 7 present · 1 passed · 0 failed · 0 reported · 6 missing

Missing is a thoroughness gap — not automatically bad. PeptIQ’s legitimacy score still weighs panel coverage; you can down-weight panels that don’t matter for your use case.

  • Identity

    Not on this COA · core

    Compound identity confirmed (e.g. HPLC, mass spec).

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Purity

    Not on this COA · core

    Reported purity percentage for the analyte.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Heavy metals

    Not on this COA

    Lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, or similar limits.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Microbial

    Not on this COA

    Bioburden / microbial limits testing.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Endotoxin

    Not on this COA · core

    LAL or chromogenic endotoxin assay.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Sterility

    Tested · passed

    Sterility testing where applicable.

    Pass

  • Residual solvent / water

    Not on this COA

    Residual solvents or water content limits.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

How to read this

Had data · good

Panel present with a pass (or clear acceptance).

Had data · bad

Panel present with a fail — a concrete quality signal.

Had data · unclear

Value reported without an explicit pass/fail mark.

Missing

Not on this certificate. Lowers thoroughness; you decide if that panel matters for your use case. PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.

Findings

Evidence-linked observations from this audit.

  • Limited testing scope

    COA only reports sterility testing (USP <71>). No identity confirmation, purity analysis, heavy metals, endotoxin, or other typical peptide quality panels are included.

  • No identity verification

    Sample name mentions 'Sterility w/ ID' but no identity testing results (MS, HPLC, NMR) are documented on this certificate.

  • No purity data

    No HPLC or other purity analysis results are provided. Cannot assess compound quality beyond sterility.

  • Recent publication date

    Published 2026-06-23, which is recent and within normal timeframe relative to current date 2026-07-29.

  • Batch number present

    Client SID MC202605 and internal Sample ID SPL-4097 are documented.

  • Lab information complete

    TrustPointe Analytics LLC with full address, contact information, and verification URL provided. QR code and verification key (5QVP7T2FKTNC) present.

  • Professional presentation

    Document has professional layout with signatures from President and Managing Director, proper headers and footers.

PeptIQ COA reports analyze document content and publicly verifiable lab signals. They are educational and not a guarantee of product quality, legality, or safety. Always consult a qualified professional before making health decisions. We never publish purchase prices, shipping details, or uploader identity.