Public COA audit
MOTS-C
Audited July 29, 2026
Several fields check out, but we found issues worth reviewing before you rely on this document.
- Legitimacy
- 72
- Confidence
- 83%
- Panels
- 2/7
- Purity (printed)
- 99.987%
Document details
Fields extracted from the certificate — not order or payment data.
- Batch / lot
- MC202605
- Identity method
- Spectral and Retention Time (RT)
- Issue date
- 2026-06-08
7-panel checklist
Had data + good, had data + bad, reported without pass/fail, or missing. Missing lowers thoroughness — you decide whether that panel matters; PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
2 of 7 present · 2 passed · 0 failed · 0 reported · 5 missing
Missing is a thoroughness gap — not automatically bad. PeptIQ’s legitimacy score still weighs panel coverage; you can down-weight panels that don’t matter for your use case.
Identity
Tested · passed · core
Compound identity confirmed (e.g. HPLC, mass spec).
ID by Spectral: 1000, ID by RT: 1.00
Purity
Tested · passed · core
Reported purity percentage for the analyte.
99.987% (average across samples)
Heavy metals
Not on this COA
Lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, or similar limits.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Microbial
Not on this COA
Bioburden / microbial limits testing.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Endotoxin
Not on this COA · core
LAL or chromogenic endotoxin assay.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Sterility
Not on this COA
Sterility testing where applicable.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Residual solvent / water
Not on this COA
Residual solvents or water content limits.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
How to read this
Had data · good
Panel present with a pass (or clear acceptance).
Had data · bad
Panel present with a fail — a concrete quality signal.
Had data · unclear
Value reported without an explicit pass/fail mark.
Missing
Not on this certificate. Lowers thoroughness; you decide if that panel matters for your use case. PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
Findings
Evidence-linked observations from this audit.
High purity results
Purity values range from 99.981% to 99.991% across five samples, consistent with high-quality research peptides. This is normal and expected for HPLC-tested peptides.
Identity confirmed by multiple methods
Identity verified by spectral analysis (1000) and retention time (1.00) with coelution control and system suitability checks (0.3 %RSD).
Batch/lot number present
Client SID MC202605 provided.
No sample receipt date
COA shows publication date (2026-06-08) but does not specify when the sample was received or tested. This is common but reduces traceability.
Lab information and verification provided
TrustPointe Analytics LLC with full address, phone, email, website, and verification URL with key (YZ2QTT2HSXZJ) provided.
Limited testing scope
Only identity and purity panels performed. No heavy metals, microbial, endotoxin, sterility, or residual solvent/water testing. This is common for basic peptide COAs but limits safety assurance.
Professional presentation
Document includes QR code, signatures from President and Managing Director, and photo attachment of vials. Formatting is consistent with professional lab reports.
PeptIQ COA reports analyze document content and publicly verifiable lab signals. They are educational and not a guarantee of product quality, legality, or safety. Always consult a qualified professional before making health decisions. We never publish purchase prices, shipping details, or uploader identity.