Public COA audit

GHK-Cu

Audited July 29, 2026

Incomplete documentation

Missing panels or key metadata — not enough evidence to treat this as a full certificate.

Legitimacy
55
Confidence
75%
Panels
1/7

Document details

Fields extracted from the certificate — not order or payment data.

Batch / lot
CU202605
Issue date
2026-05-29

7-panel checklist

Had data + good, had data + bad, reported without pass/fail, or missing. Missing lowers thoroughness — you decide whether that panel matters; PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.

1 of 7 present · 1 passed · 0 failed · 0 reported · 6 missing

Missing is a thoroughness gap — not automatically bad. PeptIQ’s legitimacy score still weighs panel coverage; you can down-weight panels that don’t matter for your use case.

  • Identity

    Not on this COA · core

    Compound identity confirmed (e.g. HPLC, mass spec).

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Purity

    Not on this COA · core

    Reported purity percentage for the analyte.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Heavy metals

    Not on this COA

    Lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, or similar limits.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Microbial

    Not on this COA

    Bioburden / microbial limits testing.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Endotoxin

    Not on this COA · core

    LAL or chromogenic endotoxin assay.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Sterility

    Tested · passed

    Sterility testing where applicable.

    Pass

  • Residual solvent / water

    Not on this COA

    Residual solvents or water content limits.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

How to read this

Had data · good

Panel present with a pass (or clear acceptance).

Had data · bad

Panel present with a fail — a concrete quality signal.

Had data · unclear

Value reported without an explicit pass/fail mark.

Missing

Not on this certificate. Lowers thoroughness; you decide if that panel matters for your use case. PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.

Findings

Evidence-linked observations from this audit.

  • Sterility-only COA

    This COA only reports sterility testing (USP <71>). No identity confirmation, purity analysis, heavy metals, endotoxin, or other standard peptide quality panels are present. A sterility-only COA does not establish compound identity or quality.

  • No purity data

    No HPLC, mass spec, or other purity/assay data provided. Cannot verify peptide quality or concentration.

  • No identity confirmation

    No mass spectrometry, amino acid analysis, or other identity verification method reported. Cannot confirm the sample is actually GHK-Cu.

  • Batch number present

    Client SID CU202605 provided as batch/lot identifier.

  • No sample receipt date

    Published date is 2026-05-29, but no sample receipt or testing date is specified.

  • Lab contact information

    TrustPointe Analytics LLC with full address, phone, email, and verification URL provided. Lab appears to be a real entity in Dorr, MI.

  • Professional presentation

    Document has professional formatting with QR code, signatures, and verification key. Layout is consistent with legitimate lab reports.

PeptIQ COA reports analyze document content and publicly verifiable lab signals. They are educational and not a guarantee of product quality, legality, or safety. Always consult a qualified professional before making health decisions. We never publish purchase prices, shipping details, or uploader identity.