Public COA audit
BPC-157 · TB-500
Audited July 28, 2026
Missing panels or key metadata — not enough evidence to treat this as a full certificate.
- Legitimacy
- 45
- Confidence
- 82%
- Panels
- 1/7
Document details
Fields extracted from the certificate — not order or payment data.
- Batch / lot
- BB202512
- Issue date
- 2025-12-30
7-panel checklist
Had data + good, had data + bad, reported without pass/fail, or missing. Missing lowers thoroughness — you decide whether that panel matters; PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
1 of 7 present · 1 passed · 0 failed · 0 reported · 6 missing
Missing is a thoroughness gap — not automatically bad. PeptIQ’s legitimacy score still weighs panel coverage; you can down-weight panels that don’t matter for your use case.
Identity
Not on this COA · core
Compound identity confirmed (e.g. HPLC, mass spec).
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Purity
Not on this COA · core
Reported purity percentage for the analyte.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Heavy metals
Not on this COA
Lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, or similar limits.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Microbial
Not on this COA
Bioburden / microbial limits testing.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Endotoxin
Tested · passed · core
LAL or chromogenic endotoxin assay.
<10.0 EU/mL
Sterility
Not on this COA
Sterility testing where applicable.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Residual solvent / water
Not on this COA
Residual solvents or water content limits.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
How to read this
Had data · good
Panel present with a pass (or clear acceptance).
Had data · bad
Panel present with a fail — a concrete quality signal.
Had data · unclear
Value reported without an explicit pass/fail mark.
Missing
Not on this certificate. Lowers thoroughness; you decide if that panel matters for your use case. PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
Findings
Evidence-linked observations from this audit.
Missing critical panels
This COA only contains endotoxin testing (USP <85>). No identity confirmation (MS, NMR, HPLC), no purity analysis (HPLC), no heavy metals, no microbial testing, and no sterility testing are present. For a peptide product, identity and purity are fundamental requirements.
No purity data
No HPLC or other purity analysis is provided. Cannot assess compound purity or quality.
No identity confirmation
No mass spectrometry, NMR, or other identity confirmation method is documented. Cannot verify the compound is actually BPC-157/TB-500.
No sample/receipt date
The COA shows a published date (2025-12-30) but no sample receipt date or testing date, making it difficult to assess sample freshness or testing timeline.
Lab information present
TrustPointe Analytics LLC with full contact information, verification URL (TrustPointeLIMS.com), and verification key (QBFVAC1RDBAD) provided. Lab appears to be a real entity in Dorr, MI.
Batch number present
Client SID BB202512 and internal sample ID SPL-2697 are documented.
Professional formatting
Document has professional layout with QR code, signatures from Ashlee Lust (President) and Joshua Lust (Managing Director), and proper header/footer information.
PeptIQ COA reports analyze document content and publicly verifiable lab signals. They are educational and not a guarantee of product quality, legality, or safety. Always consult a qualified professional before making health decisions. We never publish purchase prices, shipping details, or uploader identity.