Public COA audit
BAC Water 0.9%
Audited July 29, 2026
Several fields check out, but we found issues worth reviewing before you rely on this document.
- Legitimacy
- 88
- Confidence
- 92%
- Panels
- 1/7
Document details
Fields extracted from the certificate — not order or payment data.
- Batch / lot
- BAC202603
- Issue date
- 2026-06-12
7-panel checklist
Had data + good, had data + bad, reported without pass/fail, or missing. Missing lowers thoroughness — you decide whether that panel matters; PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
1 of 7 present · 1 passed · 0 failed · 0 reported · 6 missing
Missing is a thoroughness gap — not automatically bad. PeptIQ’s legitimacy score still weighs panel coverage; you can down-weight panels that don’t matter for your use case.
Identity
Not on this COA · core
Compound identity confirmed (e.g. HPLC, mass spec).
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Purity
Not on this COA · core
Reported purity percentage for the analyte.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Heavy metals
Not on this COA
Lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, or similar limits.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Microbial
Not on this COA
Bioburden / microbial limits testing.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Endotoxin
Tested · passed · core
LAL or chromogenic endotoxin assay.
<5.00 EU/mL
Sterility
Not on this COA
Sterility testing where applicable.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Residual solvent / water
Not on this COA
Residual solvents or water content limits.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
How to read this
Had data · good
Panel present with a pass (or clear acceptance).
Had data · bad
Panel present with a fail — a concrete quality signal.
Had data · unclear
Value reported without an explicit pass/fail mark.
Missing
Not on this certificate. Lowers thoroughness; you decide if that panel matters for your use case. PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
Findings
Evidence-linked observations from this audit.
Established testing laboratory
TrustPointe Analytics LLC is a known analytical testing laboratory in Michigan with verifiable contact information and online presence
Appropriate testing scope
Endotoxin testing via USP <85> is the appropriate and expected test for bacteriostatic water; includes quality control metrics (spike recovery 91%, spike CV 4.7%)
Clear sample identification
Client SID BAC202603 and internal Sample ID SPL-4129 both present with clear traceability
Valid publication date
Published 2026-06-12, which is before the current date of 2026-07-29
Professional presentation
Document includes QR code, verification key (2FV5RHDQ9FEV), dual signatures (President and Managing Director), and complete lab contact information
Missing sample receipt/collection date
Only publication date is provided; no explicit sample collection or receipt date documented
Limited testing scope
Only endotoxin testing performed; no sterility, identity, or other panels. This is acceptable for BAC water quality control but provides limited assurance compared to comprehensive testing
PeptIQ COA reports analyze document content and publicly verifiable lab signals. They are educational and not a guarantee of product quality, legality, or safety. Always consult a qualified professional before making health decisions. We never publish purchase prices, shipping details, or uploader identity.