Public COA audit

Tesamorelin · Ipamorelin

Audited July 28, 2026

Mostly consistent, with concerns

Several fields check out, but we found issues worth reviewing before you rely on this document.

Legitimacy
88
Confidence
92%
Panels
1/7

Document details

Fields extracted from the certificate — not order or payment data.

Batch / lot
29-3-45959
Sample date
2025-11-19
Issue date
2025-11-19

7-panel checklist

Had data + good, had data + bad, reported without pass/fail, or missing. Missing lowers thoroughness — you decide whether that panel matters; PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.

1 of 7 present · 1 passed · 0 failed · 0 reported · 6 missing

Missing is a thoroughness gap — not automatically bad. PeptIQ’s legitimacy score still weighs panel coverage; you can down-weight panels that don’t matter for your use case.

  • Identity

    Not on this COA · core

    Compound identity confirmed (e.g. HPLC, mass spec).

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Purity

    Not on this COA · core

    Reported purity percentage for the analyte.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Heavy metals

    Not on this COA

    Lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, or similar limits.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Microbial

    Not on this COA

    Bioburden / microbial limits testing.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Endotoxin

    Tested · passed · core

    LAL or chromogenic endotoxin assay.

    < 0.050 EU/mL

  • Sterility

    Not on this COA

    Sterility testing where applicable.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Residual solvent / water

    Not on this COA

    Residual solvents or water content limits.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

How to read this

Had data · good

Panel present with a pass (or clear acceptance).

Had data · bad

Panel present with a fail — a concrete quality signal.

Had data · unclear

Value reported without an explicit pass/fail mark.

Missing

Not on this certificate. Lowers thoroughness; you decide if that panel matters for your use case. PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.

Findings

Evidence-linked observations from this audit.

  • Endotoxin testing performed

    Endotoxin level measured at < 0.050 EU/mL, passing the specification of < 0.25 EU/mL using validated LAL assay method

  • Limited testing scope

    This report only covers endotoxin testing. No identity, purity, heavy metals, microbial, sterility, or residual solvent testing is included. This is a specialized endotoxin-only report, not a comprehensive COA.

  • Professional presentation

    BioRegen appears to be a legitimate independent testing laboratory with professional formatting, contact information, and verification mechanisms (QR code, report ID, validation key)

  • Clear sample identification

    Sample lot number 29-3-45959 clearly documented with company name (Biolongevity Labs), sample concentration (6/2 mg), and test date

  • Test date documented

    Test performed on 11/19/2025, signed by analyst MARIN on same date

  • Detailed methodology

    Report includes comprehensive reagent information, calibration codes, spike recovery (74% pass), detection range, and instrument serial number

PeptIQ COA reports analyze document content and publicly verifiable lab signals. They are educational and not a guarantee of product quality, legality, or safety. Always consult a qualified professional before making health decisions. We never publish purchase prices, shipping details, or uploader identity.