Public COA audit

Tesamorelin

Audited July 29, 2026

Mostly consistent, with concerns

Several fields check out, but we found issues worth reviewing before you rely on this document.

Legitimacy
92
Confidence
88%
Panels
4/7
Purity (printed)
99.9%

Document details

Fields extracted from the certificate — not order or payment data.

Batch / lot
9scnvfe
Identity method
HPLC-UV-MS
Sample date
2026-05-05
Issue date
2026-05-20

7-panel checklist

Had data + good, had data + bad, reported without pass/fail, or missing. Missing lowers thoroughness — you decide whether that panel matters; PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.

4 of 7 present · 2 passed · 0 failed · 2 reported · 3 missing

Missing is a thoroughness gap — not automatically bad. PeptIQ’s legitimacy score still weighs panel coverage; you can down-weight panels that don’t matter for your use case.

  • Identity

    Tested · passed · core

    Compound identity confirmed (e.g. HPLC, mass spec).

    ID Confirmed

  • Purity

    Tested · passed · core

    Reported purity percentage for the analyte.

    >99.9%

  • Heavy metals

    Tested · result on file

    Lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, or similar limits.

  • Microbial

    Not on this COA

    Bioburden / microbial limits testing.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Endotoxin

    Tested · result on file · core

    LAL or chromogenic endotoxin assay.

  • Sterility

    Not on this COA

    Sterility testing where applicable.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Residual solvent / water

    Not on this COA

    Residual solvents or water content limits.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

How to read this

Had data · good

Panel present with a pass (or clear acceptance).

Had data · bad

Panel present with a fail — a concrete quality signal.

Had data · unclear

Value reported without an explicit pass/fail mark.

Missing

Not on this certificate. Lowers thoroughness; you decide if that panel matters for your use case. PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.

Findings

Evidence-linked observations from this audit.

  • High chromatographic purity

    HPLC purity >99.9% with clean chromatogram showing single dominant peak

  • Mass spectral confirmation

    Identity confirmed by HPLC-UV-MS with mass spectrum showing expected m/z peaks for Tesamorelin

  • Batch/lot number present

    Batch/Lot 9scnvfe clearly stated

  • Dates within normal range

    Sample received 2026-05-05, tested 2026-05-11, report issued 2026-05-20 - all dates are sequential and reasonable

  • Established laboratory

    Krause Analytical LLC is a known third-party testing laboratory in Austin, TX with verification URL provided

  • Methods summary without results

    Page 4 describes methods for endotoxin and heavy metals testing but no numerical results are shown on the COA summary page

  • Professional presentation

    Multi-page report with chromatogram, mass spectrum, methods summary, and laboratory director signature

  • Label claim verification

    Actual content 9.61 mg vs 10 mg label claim = 96.1% of label, within acceptable range

PeptIQ COA reports analyze document content and publicly verifiable lab signals. They are educational and not a guarantee of product quality, legality, or safety. Always consult a qualified professional before making health decisions. We never publish purchase prices, shipping details, or uploader identity.