Public COA audit

Tesamorelin

Audited July 29, 2026

Mostly consistent, with concerns

Several fields check out, but we found issues worth reviewing before you rely on this document.

Legitimacy
72
Confidence
85%
Panels
3/7
Purity (printed)
99.81%

Document details

Fields extracted from the certificate — not order or payment data.

Batch / lot
8dpa32k
Identity method
HPLC-UV-MS
Sample date
2026-02-26
Issue date
2026-03-02

7-panel checklist

Had data + good, had data + bad, reported without pass/fail, or missing. Missing lowers thoroughness — you decide whether that panel matters; PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.

3 of 7 present · 2 passed · 0 failed · 1 reported · 4 missing

Missing is a thoroughness gap — not automatically bad. PeptIQ’s legitimacy score still weighs panel coverage; you can down-weight panels that don’t matter for your use case.

  • Identity

    Tested · passed · core

    Compound identity confirmed (e.g. HPLC, mass spec).

    ID Confirmed

  • Purity

    Tested · passed · core

    Reported purity percentage for the analyte.

    99.81%

  • Heavy metals

    Not on this COA

    Lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, or similar limits.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Microbial

    Not on this COA

    Bioburden / microbial limits testing.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Endotoxin

    Tested · result on file · core

    LAL or chromogenic endotoxin assay.

    0.67 EU

  • Sterility

    Not on this COA

    Sterility testing where applicable.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Residual solvent / water

    Not on this COA

    Residual solvents or water content limits.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

How to read this

Had data · good

Panel present with a pass (or clear acceptance).

Had data · bad

Panel present with a fail — a concrete quality signal.

Had data · unclear

Value reported without an explicit pass/fail mark.

Missing

Not on this certificate. Lowers thoroughness; you decide if that panel matters for your use case. PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.

Findings

Evidence-linked observations from this audit.

  • High HPLC purity

    99.81% chromatographic purity is normal for research-grade peptides and consistent with the clean chromatogram shown on page 2.

  • Mass spectral confirmation

    Mass spectrum matches reference standard for Tesamorelin (CAS 218949-48-5). Spectra shown on page 2 appear consistent.

  • Batch/lot number present

    Batch 8dpa32k clearly stated and visible on vial photo.

  • Dates are valid

    Sample received 2/26/2026, testing dates 2/28/2026 and 3/2/2026, report issued 3/2/2026. All dates are on or before 2026-07-29 and follow logical sequence.

  • Lab name inconsistency

    Document header shows 'Finnrick Analytics' and 'Finnrick.com' but footer and signature reference 'Krause Analytical LLC'. The document appears to be a Finnrick-branded certificate for testing performed by Krause Analytical, but the dual branding is unusual and not clearly explained.

  • Verification URL not independently confirmed

    Verification URL https://finnrick.com/verify is printed but cannot be independently verified from the document alone. The domain 'finnrick.com' may be a vendor/reseller rather than the testing lab itself.

  • Limited testing panels

    Only purity, identity, and endotoxin panels performed. No heavy metals, microbial, sterility, or residual solvent testing. Methods summary describes metals testing (USP/NF 233) but no results are reported.

  • Endotoxin result lacks pass/fail criteria

    Endotoxin result of 0.67 EU is reported but no acceptance limit or pass/fail determination is stated. Typical limits for injectable peptides are ≤5 EU/mg, but this is not documented.

  • Professional presentation

    Document includes chromatogram, mass spectra, methods summary, and vial photos. Formatting is consistent with professional analytical lab reports.

PeptIQ COA reports analyze document content and publicly verifiable lab signals. They are educational and not a guarantee of product quality, legality, or safety. Always consult a qualified professional before making health decisions. We never publish purchase prices, shipping details, or uploader identity.