Public COA audit
Tesamorelin
Audited July 29, 2026
Several fields check out, but we found issues worth reviewing before you rely on this document.
- Legitimacy
- 68
- Confidence
- 82%
- Panels
- 2/7
- Purity (printed)
- 71.61%
Document details
Fields extracted from the certificate — not order or payment data.
- Batch / lot
- k6fsnyx
- Identity method
- HPLC-UV-MS
- Sample date
- 2025-11-14
- Issue date
- 2025-11-25
7-panel checklist
Had data + good, had data + bad, reported without pass/fail, or missing. Missing lowers thoroughness — you decide whether that panel matters; PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
2 of 7 present · 1 passed · 0 failed · 1 reported · 5 missing
Missing is a thoroughness gap — not automatically bad. PeptIQ’s legitimacy score still weighs panel coverage; you can down-weight panels that don’t matter for your use case.
Identity
Tested · passed · core
Compound identity confirmed (e.g. HPLC, mass spec).
ID Confirmed
Purity
Tested · result on file · core
Reported purity percentage for the analyte.
71.61%
Heavy metals
Not on this COA
Lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, or similar limits.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Microbial
Not on this COA
Bioburden / microbial limits testing.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Endotoxin
Not on this COA · core
LAL or chromogenic endotoxin assay.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Sterility
Not on this COA
Sterility testing where applicable.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Residual solvent / water
Not on this COA
Residual solvents or water content limits.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
How to read this
Had data · good
Panel present with a pass (or clear acceptance).
Had data · bad
Panel present with a fail — a concrete quality signal.
Had data · unclear
Value reported without an explicit pass/fail mark.
Missing
Not on this certificate. Lowers thoroughness; you decide if that panel matters for your use case. PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
Findings
Evidence-linked observations from this audit.
Low chromatographic purity
Chromatographic purity of 71.61% is below typical research-grade standards (usually ≥95%). The label claim achievement is 76.1%, indicating significant impurities or degradation products.
Identity confirmed
Mass spectrum matches reference standard for Tesamorelin. Multiple charge states visible (m/z 644, 735) consistent with peptide analysis.
Dual branding inconsistency
Document shows both 'Finnrick Analytics' and 'Krause Analytical LLC' branding. Header says 'Finnrick.com' and 'Finnrick Analytics' but footer and signature reference 'Krause Analytical LLC'. This dual identity is unusual and raises questions about the actual testing entity.
Methods described but results missing
Page 3 describes methods for Endotoxins (USP/NF 85) and Metals (USP/NF 233) testing, but no results are provided for these panels in the COA. Only purity/potency/identity results are shown.
Dates are consistent and valid
Sample received 2025-11-14, tested 2025-11-21, report issued 2025-11-25. All dates are sequential and reasonable.
Batch/lot number present
Lab # 130342, Project 135486, Test Certificate ID k6fsnyx all documented.
Heavy watermarking and page numbering errors
Document has large 'FINNRICK' watermarks throughout. Page numbering shows '2 of 23' and '3 of 3' inconsistently, suggesting possible document assembly issues or template errors.
PeptIQ COA reports analyze document content and publicly verifiable lab signals. They are educational and not a guarantee of product quality, legality, or safety. Always consult a qualified professional before making health decisions. We never publish purchase prices, shipping details, or uploader identity.