Public COA audit

BPC-157 · TB-500

Audited July 29, 2026

Mostly consistent, with concerns

Several fields check out, but we found issues worth reviewing before you rely on this document.

Legitimacy
68
Confidence
82%
Panels
1/7

Document details

Fields extracted from the certificate — not order or payment data.

Batch / lot
Test-ED7
Sample date
2026-06-05
Issue date
2026-06-17

7-panel checklist

Had data + good, had data + bad, reported without pass/fail, or missing. Missing lowers thoroughness — you decide whether that panel matters; PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.

1 of 7 present · 0 passed · 0 failed · 1 reported · 6 missing

Missing is a thoroughness gap — not automatically bad. PeptIQ’s legitimacy score still weighs panel coverage; you can down-weight panels that don’t matter for your use case.

  • Identity

    Not on this COA · core

    Compound identity confirmed (e.g. HPLC, mass spec).

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Purity

    Not on this COA · core

    Reported purity percentage for the analyte.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Heavy metals

    Not on this COA

    Lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, or similar limits.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Microbial

    Not on this COA

    Bioburden / microbial limits testing.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Endotoxin

    Tested · result on file · core

    LAL or chromogenic endotoxin assay.

    2.852 EU/Vial

  • Sterility

    Not on this COA

    Sterility testing where applicable.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Residual solvent / water

    Not on this COA

    Residual solvents or water content limits.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

How to read this

Had data · good

Panel present with a pass (or clear acceptance).

Had data · bad

Panel present with a fail — a concrete quality signal.

Had data · unclear

Value reported without an explicit pass/fail mark.

Missing

Not on this certificate. Lowers thoroughness; you decide if that panel matters for your use case. PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.

Findings

Evidence-linked observations from this audit.

  • Endotoxin-only testing

    This report contains only endotoxin testing. No identity confirmation (HPLC/MS), no purity analysis, no heavy metals, no microbial testing. For a peptide blend, the absence of identity and purity panels is a significant gap.

  • No pass/fail criteria stated

    The endotoxin result of 2.852 EU/Vial is reported without stating whether this passes or fails acceptance criteria. Typical pharmaceutical limits are <5 EU/dose, but without context this is ambiguous.

  • No compound identity verification

    The report does not confirm the identity of BPC-157 or TB-500 via HPLC, MS, or any analytical method. This is a fundamental requirement for a complete COA.

  • No purity data

    No purity percentage or chromatographic data provided. Cannot assess product quality or composition.

  • Batch number present

    Batch Test-ED7 is clearly stated.

  • Known testing laboratory

    Janoshik is a recognized third-party analytical laboratory for peptides and performance-enhancing compounds. Contact information and verification URL provided.

  • Verification key provided

    Unique verification key 39WVPJYV7VNF and URL www.janoshik.com/verify/ allow independent verification of this report.

  • Professional presentation

    Report follows Janoshik's standard format with logo, task number #163805, signature, and QR code. Supporting photos of vial and endotoxin assay plates included.

  • Anonymous client

    Client listed as 'Anonymous'. While not inherently suspicious for a third-party test, it reduces traceability.

PeptIQ COA reports analyze document content and publicly verifiable lab signals. They are educational and not a guarantee of product quality, legality, or safety. Always consult a qualified professional before making health decisions. We never publish purchase prices, shipping details, or uploader identity.