Public COA audit
TB500 · Thymosin Beta-4
Audited July 29, 2026
Missing panels or key metadata — not enough evidence to treat this as a full certificate.
- Legitimacy
- 45
- Confidence
- 75%
- Panels
- 1/7
Document details
Fields extracted from the certificate — not order or payment data.
- Batch / lot
- Test-CY3
- Sample date
- 2026-06-05
- Issue date
- 2026-06-19
7-panel checklist
Had data + good, had data + bad, reported without pass/fail, or missing. Missing lowers thoroughness — you decide whether that panel matters; PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
1 of 7 present · 1 passed · 0 failed · 0 reported · 6 missing
Missing is a thoroughness gap — not automatically bad. PeptIQ’s legitimacy score still weighs panel coverage; you can down-weight panels that don’t matter for your use case.
Identity
Not on this COA · core
Compound identity confirmed (e.g. HPLC, mass spec).
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Purity
Not on this COA · core
Reported purity percentage for the analyte.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Heavy metals
Tested · passed
Lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, or similar limits.
As, Cd, Pb, Hg all not detected
Microbial
Not on this COA
Bioburden / microbial limits testing.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Endotoxin
Not on this COA · core
LAL or chromogenic endotoxin assay.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Sterility
Not on this COA
Sterility testing where applicable.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Residual solvent / water
Not on this COA
Residual solvents or water content limits.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
How to read this
Had data · good
Panel present with a pass (or clear acceptance).
Had data · bad
Panel present with a fail — a concrete quality signal.
Had data · unclear
Value reported without an explicit pass/fail mark.
Missing
Not on this certificate. Lowers thoroughness; you decide if that panel matters for your use case. PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
Findings
Evidence-linked observations from this audit.
No purity analysis
This report contains only heavy metals screening. No HPLC or other purity analysis is present, which is the most critical test for peptide quality assessment.
No identity confirmation
No mass spectrometry, amino acid analysis, or other identity confirmation method is documented. Cannot verify the compound is actually TB500/Thymosin Beta-4.
Limited scope testing
Only heavy metals screening was performed as an add-on test. This is not a comprehensive COA for peptide quality - it only addresses one safety parameter.
Known testing laboratory
Janoshik is a recognized third-party testing laboratory in the research compound space with verification system.
Dates are consistent
Testing ordered 14 May 2026, sample received 05 Jun 2026, analysis conducted 19 Jun 2026 - timeline is logical and all dates are on or before 2026-07-29.
Batch number present
Batch Test-CY3 is documented along with manufacturer Swiss Chems.
Professional presentation
Report includes QR code, verification key (M26SHPIV6IKZ), signature, and sample photo. Format is consistent with Janoshik's known reporting style.
PeptIQ COA reports analyze document content and publicly verifiable lab signals. They are educational and not a guarantee of product quality, legality, or safety. Always consult a qualified professional before making health decisions. We never publish purchase prices, shipping details, or uploader identity.