Public COA audit
SLU-PP-332 · (Shred) SLU-PP-332
Audited July 28, 2026
Several fields check out, but we found issues worth reviewing before you rely on this document.
- Legitimacy
- 72
- Confidence
- 85%
- Panels
- 2/7
- Purity (printed)
- 99.98%
Document details
Fields extracted from the certificate — not order or payment data.
- Batch / lot
- SHRED-0001
- Identity method
- LC-MS with UV detection
- Sample date
- 2024-12-27
- Issue date
- 2025-01-04
7-panel checklist
Had data + good, had data + bad, reported without pass/fail, or missing. Missing lowers thoroughness — you decide whether that panel matters; PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
2 of 7 present · 2 passed · 0 failed · 0 reported · 5 missing
Missing is a thoroughness gap — not automatically bad. PeptIQ’s legitimacy score still weighs panel coverage; you can down-weight panels that don’t matter for your use case.
Identity
Tested · passed · core
Compound identity confirmed (e.g. HPLC, mass spec).
SLU-PP-332 Conforms
Purity
Tested · passed · core
Reported purity percentage for the analyte.
99.98%
Heavy metals
Not on this COA
Lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, or similar limits.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Microbial
Not on this COA
Bioburden / microbial limits testing.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Endotoxin
Not on this COA · core
LAL or chromogenic endotoxin assay.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Sterility
Not on this COA
Sterility testing where applicable.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Residual solvent / water
Not on this COA
Residual solvents or water content limits.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
How to read this
Had data · good
Panel present with a pass (or clear acceptance).
Had data · bad
Panel present with a fail — a concrete quality signal.
Had data · unclear
Value reported without an explicit pass/fail mark.
Missing
Not on this certificate. Lowers thoroughness; you decide if that panel matters for your use case. PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
Findings
Evidence-linked observations from this audit.
High purity result
99.98% purity is within normal range for research compounds and is supported by chromatogram data
Identity confirmed
LC-MS with UV detection method used, compound identity matches specification with PubChem reference
Batch number present
Batch/Lot # SHRED-0001 clearly documented
Dates documented
Sample received 12/27/24, analysis conducted 1/4/25 - reasonable timeline
Lab verification unclear
BioRegen lab with verification URL provided (bioregen.com/verify), but independent verification of lab credentials not performed
Limited testing scope
Only identity and purity panels present; no heavy metals, microbial, endotoxin, sterility, or residual solvent testing documented
Non-peptide compound
SLU-PP-332 is a small molecule (REV-ERB agonist), not a peptide - unusual for peptide-focused COA auditing context
Contact email mismatch
Analyst contact email ([email protected]) differs from client contact domain (biolongevitylabs.com), which is expected but worth noting
Timing & next steps
Practical follow-ups based on document age and gaps.
coa age
This COA was issued over a year ago (570 days) — consider whether a retest is warranted for this batch.
PeptIQ COA reports analyze document content and publicly verifiable lab signals. They are educational and not a guarantee of product quality, legality, or safety. Always consult a qualified professional before making health decisions. We never publish purchase prices, shipping details, or uploader identity.