Public COA audit
Sema 10mg · GLP SM
Audited July 28, 2026
Several fields check out, but we found issues worth reviewing before you rely on this document.
- Legitimacy
- 62
- Confidence
- 75%
- Panels
- 2/7
- Purity (printed)
- 99.801%
Document details
Fields extracted from the certificate — not order or payment data.
- Batch / lot
- 665394
- Identity method
- HPLC with UV Detection Coupled with Mass Spectrometry
- Sample date
- 2026-04-06
- Issue date
- 2026-04-07
7-panel checklist
Had data + good, had data + bad, reported without pass/fail, or missing. Missing lowers thoroughness — you decide whether that panel matters; PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
2 of 7 present · 2 passed · 0 failed · 0 reported · 5 missing
Missing is a thoroughness gap — not automatically bad. PeptIQ’s legitimacy score still weighs panel coverage; you can down-weight panels that don’t matter for your use case.
Identity
Tested · passed · core
Compound identity confirmed (e.g. HPLC, mass spec).
GLP SM confirmed by mass spectrometry
Purity
Tested · passed · core
Reported purity percentage for the analyte.
99.801%
Heavy metals
Not on this COA
Lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, or similar limits.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Microbial
Not on this COA
Bioburden / microbial limits testing.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Endotoxin
Not on this COA · core
LAL or chromogenic endotoxin assay.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Sterility
Not on this COA
Sterility testing where applicable.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Residual solvent / water
Not on this COA
Residual solvents or water content limits.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
How to read this
Had data · good
Panel present with a pass (or clear acceptance).
Had data · bad
Panel present with a fail — a concrete quality signal.
Had data · unclear
Value reported without an explicit pass/fail mark.
Missing
Not on this certificate. Lowers thoroughness; you decide if that panel matters for your use case. PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
Findings
Evidence-linked observations from this audit.
High purity confirmed
99.801% purity by HPLC is within normal range for research peptides
Mass spectrometry confirmation
Mass spec data shows expected molecular ion peaks [M+4H]4+ at 1029.25 and [M+3H]3+ at 1372.10, consistent with GLP-1 analogs
Lab verification unclear
Freedom Diagnostics website and contact information provided, but independent verification of lab accreditation/credentials not immediately available from document
Generic template appearance
Document uses relatively simple formatting with stock elements; lacks detailed lab accreditation marks, QC signatures, or method validation references typical of established testing labs
Limited testing scope
Only identity and purity panels performed; no heavy metals, microbial, endotoxin, sterility, or residual solvent testing
Batch information present
Lot number 665394 clearly stated with net peptide content of 12.54 mg
Dates within normal range
Received 2026-04-06, reported 2026-04-07 (one-day turnaround is fast but plausible for HPLC-MS analysis)
PeptIQ COA reports analyze document content and publicly verifiable lab signals. They are educational and not a guarantee of product quality, legality, or safety. Always consult a qualified professional before making health decisions. We never publish purchase prices, shipping details, or uploader identity.