Public COA audit
Semaglutide
Audited July 29, 2026
Missing panels or key metadata — not enough evidence to treat this as a full certificate.
- Legitimacy
- 62
- Confidence
- 78%
- Panels
- 1/7
- Purity (printed)
- 99.519%
Document details
Fields extracted from the certificate — not order or payment data.
- Batch / lot
- HSEM-0017
- Sample date
- 2024-09-18
- Issue date
- 2024-09-19
7-panel checklist
Had data + good, had data + bad, reported without pass/fail, or missing. Missing lowers thoroughness — you decide whether that panel matters; PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
1 of 7 present · 0 passed · 0 failed · 1 reported · 6 missing
Missing is a thoroughness gap — not automatically bad. PeptIQ’s legitimacy score still weighs panel coverage; you can down-weight panels that don’t matter for your use case.
Identity
Not on this COA · core
Compound identity confirmed (e.g. HPLC, mass spec).
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Purity
Tested · result on file · core
Reported purity percentage for the analyte.
99.519%
Heavy metals
Not on this COA
Lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, or similar limits.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Microbial
Not on this COA
Bioburden / microbial limits testing.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Endotoxin
Not on this COA · core
LAL or chromogenic endotoxin assay.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Sterility
Not on this COA
Sterility testing where applicable.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Residual solvent / water
Not on this COA
Residual solvents or water content limits.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
How to read this
Had data · good
Panel present with a pass (or clear acceptance).
Had data · bad
Panel present with a fail — a concrete quality signal.
Had data · unclear
Value reported without an explicit pass/fail mark.
Missing
Not on this certificate. Lowers thoroughness; you decide if that panel matters for your use case. PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
Findings
Evidence-linked observations from this audit.
High purity reported
99.519% purity is within normal range for research-grade peptides
No identity confirmation method stated
Report does not specify the analytical method used to confirm peptide identity (e.g., MS, NMR)
Limited testing scope
Only purity testing performed; no identity confirmation, heavy metals, microbial, endotoxin, sterility, or residual solvent testing documented
Batch number present
Batch HSEM-0017 clearly documented
Dates documented and reasonable
Testing ordered 13 SEP 2024, sample received 18 SEP 2024, analysis conducted 19 SEP 2024 - logical sequence
Known testing laboratory
Janoshik is a recognized third-party peptide testing laboratory
Verification system provided
Unique verification key 3HU4VUZW1YAN provided with URL www.janoshik.com/verify/
Minimal analytical detail
Report lacks chromatograms, spectra, detailed methodology, or specification limits
Timing & next steps
Practical follow-ups based on document age and gaps.
coa age
This COA was issued over a year ago (678 days) — consider whether a retest is warranted for this batch.
PeptIQ COA reports analyze document content and publicly verifiable lab signals. They are educational and not a guarantee of product quality, legality, or safety. Always consult a qualified professional before making health decisions. We never publish purchase prices, shipping details, or uploader identity.