Public COA audit

Retatrutide

Audited July 29, 2026

Mostly consistent, with concerns

Several fields check out, but we found issues worth reviewing before you rely on this document.

Legitimacy
72
Confidence
85%
Panels
2/7
Purity (printed)
99.88%

Document details

Fields extracted from the certificate — not order or payment data.

Batch / lot
dpk7rpf
Identity method
HPLC-UV-MS
Sample date
2026-02-06
Issue date
2026-02-20

7-panel checklist

Had data + good, had data + bad, reported without pass/fail, or missing. Missing lowers thoroughness — you decide whether that panel matters; PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.

2 of 7 present · 2 passed · 0 failed · 0 reported · 5 missing

Missing is a thoroughness gap — not automatically bad. PeptIQ’s legitimacy score still weighs panel coverage; you can down-weight panels that don’t matter for your use case.

  • Identity

    Tested · passed · core

    Compound identity confirmed (e.g. HPLC, mass spec).

    ID Confirmed

  • Purity

    Tested · passed · core

    Reported purity percentage for the analyte.

    99.88%

  • Heavy metals

    Not on this COA

    Lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, or similar limits.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Microbial

    Not on this COA

    Bioburden / microbial limits testing.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Endotoxin

    Not on this COA · core

    LAL or chromogenic endotoxin assay.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Sterility

    Not on this COA

    Sterility testing where applicable.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Residual solvent / water

    Not on this COA

    Residual solvents or water content limits.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

How to read this

Had data · good

Panel present with a pass (or clear acceptance).

Had data · bad

Panel present with a fail — a concrete quality signal.

Had data · unclear

Value reported without an explicit pass/fail mark.

Missing

Not on this certificate. Lowers thoroughness; you decide if that panel matters for your use case. PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.

Findings

Evidence-linked observations from this audit.

  • High purity confirmed

    99.88% chromatographic purity by HPLC-UV/MS, which is normal for research-grade peptides

  • Identity confirmed

    Mass spectrum matches authentic standard, CAS number 2381089-83-2 provided

  • Batch/lot number present

    Batch dpk7rpf clearly identified with photos of vial

  • Dates within normal range

    Sample received 2/6/2026, tested 2/15/2026, report issued 2/20/2026 - all reasonable and sequential

  • Branding inconsistency

    Document shows both 'Finnrick Analytics' and 'Krause Analytical LLC' branding. Header says 'Finnrick.com' and 'Finnrick Analytics Lab #200971' but footer and signature reference 'Krause Analytical LLC' at same address. This dual branding is unusual but could indicate a parent/subsidiary relationship or rebranding.

  • Limited testing panels

    Only identity and purity panels show results. Methods summary describes endotoxin and metals testing procedures but no results are reported for these panels. This is not uncommon for basic peptide COAs but limits comprehensive quality assessment.

  • Professional presentation

    Document includes chromatogram, mass spectrum data, detailed methods summary, and proper USP/NF method references

PeptIQ COA reports analyze document content and publicly verifiable lab signals. They are educational and not a guarantee of product quality, legality, or safety. Always consult a qualified professional before making health decisions. We never publish purchase prices, shipping details, or uploader identity.