Public COA audit

GLP-RT · Retatrutide

Audited July 29, 2026

Mostly consistent, with concerns

Several fields check out, but we found issues worth reviewing before you rely on this document.

Legitimacy
72
Confidence
83%
Panels
3/7
Purity (printed)
99.947%

Document details

Fields extracted from the certificate — not order or payment data.

Batch / lot
0005
Identity method
HPLC with UV Detection Coupled with Mass Spectrometry (LCMS/MS)
Sample date
2025-11-19
Issue date
2025-11-21

7-panel checklist

Had data + good, had data + bad, reported without pass/fail, or missing. Missing lowers thoroughness — you decide whether that panel matters; PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.

3 of 7 present · 3 passed · 0 failed · 0 reported · 4 missing

Missing is a thoroughness gap — not automatically bad. PeptIQ’s legitimacy score still weighs panel coverage; you can down-weight panels that don’t matter for your use case.

  • Identity

    Tested · passed · core

    Compound identity confirmed (e.g. HPLC, mass spec).

    GLP-RT confirmed via mass spectrometry with [M+3H]3+ 1577.23, [M+3H+K]4+ 1192.88

  • Purity

    Tested · passed · core

    Reported purity percentage for the analyte.

    99.947%

  • Heavy metals

    Not on this COA

    Lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, or similar limits.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Microbial

    Not on this COA

    Bioburden / microbial limits testing.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Endotoxin

    Tested · passed · core

    LAL or chromogenic endotoxin assay.

    ≤ 0.05 EU/mL (both replicates)

  • Sterility

    Not on this COA

    Sterility testing where applicable.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Residual solvent / water

    Not on this COA

    Residual solvents or water content limits.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

How to read this

Had data · good

Panel present with a pass (or clear acceptance).

Had data · bad

Panel present with a fail — a concrete quality signal.

Had data · unclear

Value reported without an explicit pass/fail mark.

Missing

Not on this certificate. Lowers thoroughness; you decide if that panel matters for your use case. PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.

Findings

Evidence-linked observations from this audit.

  • High purity confirmed

    99.947% purity by HPLC is within normal range for research-grade peptides and supported by clean chromatogram showing single dominant peak

  • Mass spectrometry confirmation

    Identity confirmed via LCMS/MS with appropriate mass-to-charge ratios for GLP-RT/Retatrutide shown in spectrum

  • Endotoxin testing included

    Endotoxin testing performed in duplicate per USP <85> guidelines, both replicates pass at ≤ 0.05 EU/mL

  • Batch information present

    Lot number 0005 clearly stated, net peptide content 12.62 mg documented

  • Dates within normal range

    Received 2025-11-19, reported 2025-11-21 (2-day turnaround is reasonable for HPLC/MS testing)

  • Limited lab verification information

    Freedom Diagnostics claims USA operation with searchable verification URL, but no accreditation logos (ISO 17025, GMP, etc.) visible on certificate

  • Two separate accession numbers for same lot

    Page 1 shows accession 2511190035 (purity/identity), page 2 shows 2511190036 (endotoxin) for same product lot 0005. While splitting tests across accessions can be legitimate, this creates potential confusion

  • Professional but generic template

    Document uses clean professional formatting but lacks unique lab-specific design elements or security features common in established testing facilities

  • Limited testing scope

    Only purity, identity, and endotoxin panels present. Missing heavy metals, microbial, sterility, and residual solvent/water testing common in comprehensive COAs

PeptIQ COA reports analyze document content and publicly verifiable lab signals. They are educational and not a guarantee of product quality, legality, or safety. Always consult a qualified professional before making health decisions. We never publish purchase prices, shipping details, or uploader identity.