Public COA audit

Retatrutide

Audited July 29, 2026

Mostly consistent, with concerns

Several fields check out, but we found issues worth reviewing before you rely on this document.

Legitimacy
72
Confidence
83%
Panels
3/7
Purity (printed)
99.9%

Document details

Fields extracted from the certificate — not order or payment data.

Batch / lot
38h96wg
Identity method
HPLC-UV-MS
Sample date
2026-06-09
Issue date
2026-06-16

7-panel checklist

Had data + good, had data + bad, reported without pass/fail, or missing. Missing lowers thoroughness — you decide whether that panel matters; PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.

3 of 7 present · 3 passed · 0 failed · 0 reported · 4 missing

Missing is a thoroughness gap — not automatically bad. PeptIQ’s legitimacy score still weighs panel coverage; you can down-weight panels that don’t matter for your use case.

  • Identity

    Tested · passed · core

    Compound identity confirmed (e.g. HPLC, mass spec).

    ID Confirmed

  • Purity

    Tested · passed · core

    Reported purity percentage for the analyte.

    >99.9%

  • Heavy metals

    Not on this COA

    Lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, or similar limits.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Microbial

    Not on this COA

    Bioburden / microbial limits testing.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Endotoxin

    Tested · passed · core

    LAL or chromogenic endotoxin assay.

    <0.5 EU

  • Sterility

    Not on this COA

    Sterility testing where applicable.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Residual solvent / water

    Not on this COA

    Residual solvents or water content limits.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

How to read this

Had data · good

Panel present with a pass (or clear acceptance).

Had data · bad

Panel present with a fail — a concrete quality signal.

Had data · unclear

Value reported without an explicit pass/fail mark.

Missing

Not on this certificate. Lowers thoroughness; you decide if that panel matters for your use case. PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.

Findings

Evidence-linked observations from this audit.

  • Dual branding inconsistency

    Document shows both 'Finnrick Analytics' and 'Krause Analytical LLC' branding. Header states 'Finnrick Analytics' and 'Finnrick.com' but footer and signature reference 'Krause Analytical LLC' at 8127 Mesa Drive Suite B-206 Austin, TX 78759. This dual identity is unusual and may indicate reseller/white-label arrangement or document assembly from multiple sources.

  • Verification URL domain mismatch

    Verification URL is https://finnrick.com/verify but the performing laboratory is stated as Krause Analytical LLC. The relationship between Finnrick and Krause is not clearly explained on the COA.

  • High purity with supporting chromatogram

    Chromatographic purity >99.9% is supported by clean HPLC chromatogram (page 2) showing single dominant peak at ~7 minutes with minimal impurities. This is normal for research-grade peptides.

  • Mass spectral confirmation provided

    Mass spectrum (page 3) shows expected molecular ion peaks for Retatrutide with m/z values around 1586.5, 1585.7, and charge state series consistent with peptide structure. Identity confirmed by HPLC-UV-MS.

  • Batch/lot number present

    Batch/Lot 38h96wg clearly stated and matches Test Certificate ID.

  • Dates are logical and recent

    Sample received 6/9/2026, testing performed 6/11-6/14/2026, report issued 6/16/2026. All dates are sequential, reasonable, and within valid range (on or before 2026-07-29).

  • Limited testing panels

    Only purity, identity, and endotoxin testing performed. No heavy metals, microbial contamination, sterility, or residual solvent/water content testing. While not necessarily indicative of fraud, this is a limited panel for comprehensive quality assurance.

  • Large watermark overlay

    Prominent 'FINNRICK' watermark overlays entire document, which is unusual for final issued COAs. May indicate sample/draft status or anti-counterfeiting measure, but reduces professional appearance.

  • Potency below label claim

    Actual content 27.5 mg vs. label claim 30 mg (91.8% of label). While within some acceptable ranges, this is below the stated amount and should be noted by end users.

PeptIQ COA reports analyze document content and publicly verifiable lab signals. They are educational and not a guarantee of product quality, legality, or safety. Always consult a qualified professional before making health decisions. We never publish purchase prices, shipping details, or uploader identity.