Public COA audit

Retatrutide

Audited July 29, 2026

Mostly consistent, with concerns

Several fields check out, but we found issues worth reviewing before you rely on this document.

Legitimacy
92
Confidence
93%
Panels
4/7
Purity (printed)
99.9%

Document details

Fields extracted from the certificate — not order or payment data.

Batch / lot
ntm93fs
Identity method
HPLC-UV-MS
Sample date
2026-03-18

7-panel checklist

Had data + good, had data + bad, reported without pass/fail, or missing. Missing lowers thoroughness — you decide whether that panel matters; PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.

4 of 7 present · 3 passed · 0 failed · 1 reported · 3 missing

Missing is a thoroughness gap — not automatically bad. PeptIQ’s legitimacy score still weighs panel coverage; you can down-weight panels that don’t matter for your use case.

  • Identity

    Tested · passed · core

    Compound identity confirmed (e.g. HPLC, mass spec).

    ID Confirmed

  • Purity

    Tested · passed · core

    Reported purity percentage for the analyte.

    >99.9%

  • Heavy metals

    Tested · passed

    Lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, or similar limits.

    As: ND, Cd: ND, Pb: 0.54 µg, Hg: ND

  • Microbial

    Not on this COA

    Bioburden / microbial limits testing.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Endotoxin

    Tested · result on file · core

    LAL or chromogenic endotoxin assay.

    0.67 EU

  • Sterility

    Not on this COA

    Sterility testing where applicable.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Residual solvent / water

    Not on this COA

    Residual solvents or water content limits.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

How to read this

Had data · good

Panel present with a pass (or clear acceptance).

Had data · bad

Panel present with a fail — a concrete quality signal.

Had data · unclear

Value reported without an explicit pass/fail mark.

Missing

Not on this certificate. Lowers thoroughness; you decide if that panel matters for your use case. PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.

Findings

Evidence-linked observations from this audit.

  • Excellent chromatographic purity

    HPLC purity >99.9% is excellent and typical for high-quality research peptides. Chromatogram shows single dominant peak at 6.58 min with minimal impurities.

  • Mass spectral confirmation

    Mass spectrum matches reference standard for Retatrutide (CAS 2381089-83-2). Both sample and reference spectra provided on page 2.

  • Batch/lot number present

    Batch/lot ntm93fs clearly stated with label claim 30 mg, actual 27.7 mg (92.4% of label).

  • Testing dates documented

    Sample received 3/18/2026, peptide analysis 3/22/2026, endotoxin 3/26/2026, metals 4/7/2026. All dates are sequential and reasonable.

  • Established testing laboratory

    Krause Analytical LLC is a known contract testing lab in Austin, TX. Document includes lab director signature (Mark C. Krause), address, and verification URL.

  • Comprehensive testing suite

    Includes identity, purity, endotoxin, and FDA critical metals (As, Cd, Pb, Hg). Methods summary provided on page 3 with USP references.

  • Missing microbial and sterility panels

    No microbial contamination testing (total aerobic count, yeast/mold) or sterility testing documented. Endotoxin testing alone does not cover full microbial safety.

  • Professional presentation

    Multi-page report with chromatogram, mass spectra, methods summary, and watermarking. Consistent branding between Finnrick (vendor) and Krause Analytical (testing lab).

PeptIQ COA reports analyze document content and publicly verifiable lab signals. They are educational and not a guarantee of product quality, legality, or safety. Always consult a qualified professional before making health decisions. We never publish purchase prices, shipping details, or uploader identity.