Public COA audit
BPC-157 · TB-500 (TB4)
Audited July 29, 2026
Missing panels or key metadata — not enough evidence to treat this as a full certificate.
- Legitimacy
- 45
- Confidence
- 75%
- Panels
- 0/7
Document details
Fields extracted from the certificate — not order or payment data.
- Batch / lot
- TBB20N040825
- Sample date
- 2025-04-16
- Issue date
- 2025-04-18
7-panel checklist
Had data + good, had data + bad, reported without pass/fail, or missing. Missing lowers thoroughness — you decide whether that panel matters; PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
0 of 7 present · 0 passed · 0 failed · 0 reported · 7 missing
Missing is a thoroughness gap — not automatically bad. PeptIQ’s legitimacy score still weighs panel coverage; you can down-weight panels that don’t matter for your use case.
Identity
Not on this COA · core
Compound identity confirmed (e.g. HPLC, mass spec).
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Purity
Not on this COA · core
Reported purity percentage for the analyte.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Heavy metals
Not on this COA
Lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, or similar limits.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Microbial
Not on this COA
Bioburden / microbial limits testing.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Endotoxin
Not on this COA · core
LAL or chromogenic endotoxin assay.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Sterility
Not on this COA
Sterility testing where applicable.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Residual solvent / water
Not on this COA
Residual solvents or water content limits.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
How to read this
Had data · good
Panel present with a pass (or clear acceptance).
Had data · bad
Panel present with a fail — a concrete quality signal.
Had data · unclear
Value reported without an explicit pass/fail mark.
Missing
Not on this certificate. Lowers thoroughness; you decide if that panel matters for your use case. PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
Findings
Evidence-linked observations from this audit.
No analytical panels present
This document only reports mass/weight measurements (mg) for two peptides in a blend. No identity confirmation (MS, HPLC), purity analysis, or safety panels (heavy metals, microbial, endotoxin, sterility, solvents) are included.
No purity data
Document does not provide HPLC purity percentage or any chromatographic analysis. Only mass measurements are given.
No identity confirmation
No mass spectrometry, HPLC retention time, or other identity verification method is documented.
Minimal test report
The test requested was 'Assessment of a peptide vial or vials' with only mass measurements provided. This is not a comprehensive Certificate of Analysis but rather a simple quantitation report.
Batch number present
Batch TBB20N040825 is clearly documented.
Dates are valid and consistent
Testing ordered 12 APR 2025, sample received 16 APR 2025, analysis conducted 18 APR 2025. All dates are logical and within the valid range.
Known testing lab
Janoshik is a recognized peptide testing laboratory. Verification URL and unique key (UHDNUI4ERVEK) are provided.
Timing & next steps
Practical follow-ups based on document age and gaps.
coa age
This COA was issued over a year ago (467 days) — consider whether a retest is warranted for this batch.
PeptIQ COA reports analyze document content and publicly verifiable lab signals. They are educational and not a guarantee of product quality, legality, or safety. Always consult a qualified professional before making health decisions. We never publish purchase prices, shipping details, or uploader identity.