Public COA audit

BPC-157 · TB-500 (TB4)

Audited July 29, 2026

Incomplete documentation

Missing panels or key metadata — not enough evidence to treat this as a full certificate.

Legitimacy
45
Confidence
75%
Panels
0/7

Document details

Fields extracted from the certificate — not order or payment data.

Batch / lot
TBB20N050725
Sample date
2025-05-20
Issue date
2025-05-23

7-panel checklist

Had data + good, had data + bad, reported without pass/fail, or missing. Missing lowers thoroughness — you decide whether that panel matters; PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.

0 of 7 present · 0 passed · 0 failed · 0 reported · 7 missing

Missing is a thoroughness gap — not automatically bad. PeptIQ’s legitimacy score still weighs panel coverage; you can down-weight panels that don’t matter for your use case.

  • Identity

    Not on this COA · core

    Compound identity confirmed (e.g. HPLC, mass spec).

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Purity

    Not on this COA · core

    Reported purity percentage for the analyte.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Heavy metals

    Not on this COA

    Lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, or similar limits.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Microbial

    Not on this COA

    Bioburden / microbial limits testing.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Endotoxin

    Not on this COA · core

    LAL or chromogenic endotoxin assay.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Sterility

    Not on this COA

    Sterility testing where applicable.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Residual solvent / water

    Not on this COA

    Residual solvents or water content limits.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

How to read this

Had data · good

Panel present with a pass (or clear acceptance).

Had data · bad

Panel present with a fail — a concrete quality signal.

Had data · unclear

Value reported without an explicit pass/fail mark.

Missing

Not on this certificate. Lowers thoroughness; you decide if that panel matters for your use case. PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.

Findings

Evidence-linked observations from this audit.

  • No analytical panels present

    Document only shows mass measurements (10.47mg, 10.50mg, 10.49mg for BPC-157 and 10.68mg, 10.63mg, 10.59mg for TB-500). No identity confirmation, purity analysis, HPLC, MS, or any other quality testing data provided.

  • No purity data

    Test report describes 'Assessment of a peptide vial or vials' but provides only mass measurements, not purity percentages or chromatographic data.

  • No identity confirmation

    No mass spectrometry, amino acid analysis, or other identity verification method reported.

  • Batch number present

    Batch TBB20N050725 clearly stated.

  • Dates present and logical

    Testing ordered 17 MAY 2025, sample received 20 MAY 2025, analysis conducted 23 MAY 2025. Timeline is reasonable and all dates are in the past relative to 2026-07-29.

  • Known testing lab

    Janoshik is a recognized peptide testing laboratory. Verification URL and unique key (5356H8PBW23T) provided.

  • Unusual report format

    Report format is atypical for comprehensive COA. Appears to be a simple mass verification rather than full analytical testing. QR code present but no detailed analytical methods or specifications listed.

Timing & next steps

Practical follow-ups based on document age and gaps.

  • coa age

    This COA was issued over a year ago (432 days) — consider whether a retest is warranted for this batch.

PeptIQ COA reports analyze document content and publicly verifiable lab signals. They are educational and not a guarantee of product quality, legality, or safety. Always consult a qualified professional before making health decisions. We never publish purchase prices, shipping details, or uploader identity.