Public COA audit
Slu-PP-332
Audited July 29, 2026
Missing panels or key metadata — not enough evidence to treat this as a full certificate.
- Legitimacy
- 45
- Confidence
- 75%
- Panels
- 0/7
Document details
Fields extracted from the certificate — not order or payment data.
- Batch / lot
- 25 F 023
- Sample date
- 2025-06-27
- Issue date
- 2025-07-02
7-panel checklist
Had data + good, had data + bad, reported without pass/fail, or missing. Missing lowers thoroughness — you decide whether that panel matters; PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
0 of 7 present · 0 passed · 0 failed · 0 reported · 7 missing
Missing is a thoroughness gap — not automatically bad. PeptIQ’s legitimacy score still weighs panel coverage; you can down-weight panels that don’t matter for your use case.
Identity
Not on this COA · core
Compound identity confirmed (e.g. HPLC, mass spec).
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Purity
Not on this COA · core
Reported purity percentage for the analyte.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Heavy metals
Not on this COA
Lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, or similar limits.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Microbial
Not on this COA
Bioburden / microbial limits testing.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Endotoxin
Not on this COA · core
LAL or chromogenic endotoxin assay.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Sterility
Not on this COA
Sterility testing where applicable.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Residual solvent / water
Not on this COA
Residual solvents or water content limits.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
How to read this
Had data · good
Panel present with a pass (or clear acceptance).
Had data · bad
Panel present with a fail — a concrete quality signal.
Had data · unclear
Value reported without an explicit pass/fail mark.
Missing
Not on this certificate. Lowers thoroughness; you decide if that panel matters for your use case. PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
Findings
Evidence-linked observations from this audit.
Unusual document format
This appears to be a preliminary test report rather than a complete Certificate of Analysis. The document states 'See picture or pictures attached' for sample description, suggesting this is a cover page.
No analytical data provided
The Results section shows only mass spectrometry values (235.14; 237.74; 250.78; 253.90; 247.58) without context, interpretation, or any standard COA panels (purity, identity confirmation, contaminants). The document requests 'Qualitative and quantitative analysis' but does not present completed results.
Purity not stated
No purity percentage or HPLC chromatogram is provided. The mass spec values alone do not constitute a purity determination.
Identity confirmation absent
No clear identity confirmation method or pass/fail result is stated. The mass spec values may be related to identity but are not interpreted or confirmed.
Batch number present
Batch 25 F 023 is clearly stated.
Dates are reasonable
Testing ordered 25 JUN 2025, sample received 27 JUN 2025, analysis conducted 02 JUL 2025. All dates are sequential and within normal timeframes.
Known testing laboratory
Janoshik is a recognized third-party testing laboratory in the peptide/research compound space. Contact information and verification URL are provided.
Verification key provided but incomplete report
A verification key (D3462Y92ZI9A) and URL are provided, which is positive, but the document itself lacks the analytical data typically verified.
Timing & next steps
Practical follow-ups based on document age and gaps.
coa age
This COA was issued over a year ago (392 days) — consider whether a retest is warranted for this batch.
PeptIQ COA reports analyze document content and publicly verifiable lab signals. They are educational and not a guarantee of product quality, legality, or safety. Always consult a qualified professional before making health decisions. We never publish purchase prices, shipping details, or uploader identity.