Public COA audit
IGF-LR3 · IGF-1 LR3
Audited July 29, 2026
Multiple signals on this document conflict with known lab formats or verification patterns.
- Legitimacy
- 15
- Confidence
- 88%
- Panels
- 1/7
Document details
Fields extracted from the certificate — not order or payment data.
- Batch / lot
- IGF1N071125
- Sample date
- 2025-07-21
- Issue date
- 2025-07-23
7-panel checklist
Had data + good, had data + bad, reported without pass/fail, or missing. Missing lowers thoroughness — you decide whether that panel matters; PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
1 of 7 present · 0 passed · 1 failed · 0 reported · 6 missing
Missing is a thoroughness gap — not automatically bad. PeptIQ’s legitimacy score still weighs panel coverage; you can down-weight panels that don’t matter for your use case.
Identity
Tested · failed · core
Compound identity confirmed (e.g. HPLC, mass spec).
not detected
Purity
Not on this COA · core
Reported purity percentage for the analyte.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Heavy metals
Not on this COA
Lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, or similar limits.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Microbial
Not on this COA
Bioburden / microbial limits testing.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Endotoxin
Not on this COA · core
LAL or chromogenic endotoxin assay.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Sterility
Not on this COA
Sterility testing where applicable.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Residual solvent / water
Not on this COA
Residual solvents or water content limits.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
How to read this
Had data · good
Panel present with a pass (or clear acceptance).
Had data · bad
Panel present with a fail — a concrete quality signal.
Had data · unclear
Value reported without an explicit pass/fail mark.
Missing
Not on this certificate. Lowers thoroughness; you decide if that panel matters for your use case. PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
Findings
Evidence-linked observations from this audit.
Target compound not detected
The test result explicitly states 'IGF-1 LR3: not detected', meaning the ordered peptide was absent from the sample. This is a complete failure of identity verification.
Contamination with other peptides
Comments section states 'Other peptides detected: GHRP-2, tesamorelin, ipamorelin and MGF' - the vial contains multiple wrong peptides instead of the ordered IGF-LR3.
No purity data provided
No HPLC purity percentage or chromatogram is included. For a peptide COA, this is a fundamental omission.
Minimal testing scope
Only identity testing was performed. No purity quantification, heavy metals, microbial, endotoxin, sterility, or solvent/water content testing.
Unusual report structure
The document format is atypical for Janoshik reports - lacks detailed analytical data, chromatograms, or quantitative measurements that are standard in legitimate peptide COAs.
Verification key provided
Document includes verification URL (www.janoshik.com/verify/) and unique key (MNK8G9HGQX8B), which could be checked for authenticity but cannot be verified within this audit.
Batch number present
Batch number IGF1N071125 is clearly stated.
Timing & next steps
Practical follow-ups based on document age and gaps.
coa age
This COA was issued over a year ago (371 days) — consider whether a retest is warranted for this batch.
PeptIQ COA reports analyze document content and publicly verifiable lab signals. They are educational and not a guarantee of product quality, legality, or safety. Always consult a qualified professional before making health decisions. We never publish purchase prices, shipping details, or uploader identity.