Public COA audit

CJC-1295 with no dac · CJC-1295 (mod GRF 1-29)

Audited July 29, 2026

Mostly consistent, with concerns

Several fields check out, but we found issues worth reviewing before you rely on this document.

Legitimacy
72
Confidence
85%
Panels
1/7
Purity (printed)
99.43%

Document details

Fields extracted from the certificate — not order or payment data.

Batch / lot
CND10N070125
Sample date
2025-07-11
Issue date
2025-07-15

7-panel checklist

Had data + good, had data + bad, reported without pass/fail, or missing. Missing lowers thoroughness — you decide whether that panel matters; PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.

1 of 7 present · 0 passed · 0 failed · 1 reported · 6 missing

Missing is a thoroughness gap — not automatically bad. PeptIQ’s legitimacy score still weighs panel coverage; you can down-weight panels that don’t matter for your use case.

  • Identity

    Not on this COA · core

    Compound identity confirmed (e.g. HPLC, mass spec).

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Purity

    Tested · result on file · core

    Reported purity percentage for the analyte.

    99.334%; 99.422%; 99.532%

  • Heavy metals

    Not on this COA

    Lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, or similar limits.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Microbial

    Not on this COA

    Bioburden / microbial limits testing.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Endotoxin

    Not on this COA · core

    LAL or chromogenic endotoxin assay.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Sterility

    Not on this COA

    Sterility testing where applicable.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Residual solvent / water

    Not on this COA

    Residual solvents or water content limits.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

How to read this

Had data · good

Panel present with a pass (or clear acceptance).

Had data · bad

Panel present with a fail — a concrete quality signal.

Had data · unclear

Value reported without an explicit pass/fail mark.

Missing

Not on this certificate. Lowers thoroughness; you decide if that panel matters for your use case. PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.

Findings

Evidence-linked observations from this audit.

  • High purity reported

    Three replicate measurements show purity of 99.334%, 99.422%, and 99.532% (average ~99.43%). This is within normal range for research-grade peptides and is not inherently suspicious.

  • No identity confirmation method stated

    The report does not explicitly state the analytical method used for identity confirmation (e.g., mass spectrometry). Only purity values are provided.

  • Batch number present

    Batch/lot number CND10N070125 is clearly stated.

  • Dates are consistent and valid

    Testing ordered 07 JUL 2025, sample received 11 JUL 2025, analysis conducted 15 JUL 2025. All dates are logical, sequential, and on or before 2026-07-29.

  • Known testing laboratory

    Janoshik Analytical is a recognized third-party peptide testing laboratory. Contact information and verification URL are provided.

  • Limited testing scope

    Only purity testing is documented. No identity confirmation, heavy metals, microbial, endotoxin, sterility, or residual solvent/water testing is shown. This is common for basic peptide purity assessments but limits the comprehensiveness of the COA.

  • Professional formatting with verification key

    Document includes QR code, unique verification key (F67MZD52SP4L), signature, and professional layout consistent with Janoshik reports.

Timing & next steps

Practical follow-ups based on document age and gaps.

  • coa age

    This COA was issued over a year ago (379 days) — consider whether a retest is warranted for this batch.

PeptIQ COA reports analyze document content and publicly verifiable lab signals. They are educational and not a guarantee of product quality, legality, or safety. Always consult a qualified professional before making health decisions. We never publish purchase prices, shipping details, or uploader identity.