Public COA audit
AOD 9604
Audited July 29, 2026
Several fields check out, but we found issues worth reviewing before you rely on this document.
- Legitimacy
- 72
- Confidence
- 82%
- Panels
- 1/7
- Purity (printed)
- 99.105%
Document details
Fields extracted from the certificate — not order or payment data.
- Batch / lot
- AODN061225
- Sample date
- 2025-06-27
- Issue date
- 2025-06-29
7-panel checklist
Had data + good, had data + bad, reported without pass/fail, or missing. Missing lowers thoroughness — you decide whether that panel matters; PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
1 of 7 present · 0 passed · 0 failed · 1 reported · 6 missing
Missing is a thoroughness gap — not automatically bad. PeptIQ’s legitimacy score still weighs panel coverage; you can down-weight panels that don’t matter for your use case.
Identity
Not on this COA · core
Compound identity confirmed (e.g. HPLC, mass spec).
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Purity
Tested · result on file · core
Reported purity percentage for the analyte.
99.105%
Heavy metals
Not on this COA
Lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, or similar limits.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Microbial
Not on this COA
Bioburden / microbial limits testing.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Endotoxin
Not on this COA · core
LAL or chromogenic endotoxin assay.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Sterility
Not on this COA
Sterility testing where applicable.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Residual solvent / water
Not on this COA
Residual solvents or water content limits.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
How to read this
Had data · good
Panel present with a pass (or clear acceptance).
Had data · bad
Panel present with a fail — a concrete quality signal.
Had data · unclear
Value reported without an explicit pass/fail mark.
Missing
Not on this certificate. Lowers thoroughness; you decide if that panel matters for your use case. PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
Findings
Evidence-linked observations from this audit.
High purity reported
99.105% purity is within normal range for research peptides and does not indicate fabrication
No identity confirmation method stated
Report does not specify the analytical method used (e.g., HPLC, MS) or include identity confirmation data such as mass spec results or retention time
Limited testing scope
Only purity testing is documented; no heavy metals, microbial, endotoxin, sterility, or residual solvent testing reported
Batch number present
Batch AODN061225 is clearly stated
Dates are consistent and valid
Testing ordered 25 JUN 2025, sample received 27 JUN 2025, analysis conducted 29 JUN 2025 - logical sequence and all dates are on or before 2026-07-29
Known testing laboratory
Janoshik Analytical is a recognized peptide testing laboratory with verification system
Verification key provided
Unique verification key VNHED1DJEA3 provided with URL www.janoshik.com/verify/ for independent verification
Minimal detail in report
Report lacks chromatogram, detailed methodology, analyst name, or quality control data that would typically accompany analytical testing
Timing & next steps
Practical follow-ups based on document age and gaps.
coa age
This COA was issued over a year ago (395 days) — consider whether a retest is warranted for this batch.
PeptIQ COA reports analyze document content and publicly verifiable lab signals. They are educational and not a guarantee of product quality, legality, or safety. Always consult a qualified professional before making health decisions. We never publish purchase prices, shipping details, or uploader identity.