Public COA audit
Ovagen
Audited July 29, 2026
Several fields check out, but we found issues worth reviewing before you rely on this document.
- Legitimacy
- 72
- Confidence
- 85%
- Panels
- 2/7
- Purity (printed)
- 92.861%
Document details
Fields extracted from the certificate — not order or payment data.
- Batch / lot
- N/A
- Identity method
- HPLC with UV Detection Coupled with Mass Spectrometry
- Sample date
- 2026-02-13
- Issue date
- 2026-02-16
7-panel checklist
Had data + good, had data + bad, reported without pass/fail, or missing. Missing lowers thoroughness — you decide whether that panel matters; PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
2 of 7 present · 2 passed · 0 failed · 0 reported · 5 missing
Missing is a thoroughness gap — not automatically bad. PeptIQ’s legitimacy score still weighs panel coverage; you can down-weight panels that don’t matter for your use case.
Identity
Tested · passed · core
Compound identity confirmed (e.g. HPLC, mass spec).
Ovagen confirmed by mass spectrometry [M+H]+ 375.93, 857.93
Purity
Tested · passed · core
Reported purity percentage for the analyte.
92.861%
Heavy metals
Not on this COA
Lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, or similar limits.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Microbial
Not on this COA
Bioburden / microbial limits testing.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Endotoxin
Not on this COA · core
LAL or chromogenic endotoxin assay.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Sterility
Not on this COA
Sterility testing where applicable.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Residual solvent / water
Not on this COA
Residual solvents or water content limits.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
How to read this
Had data · good
Panel present with a pass (or clear acceptance).
Had data · bad
Panel present with a fail — a concrete quality signal.
Had data · unclear
Value reported without an explicit pass/fail mark.
Missing
Not on this certificate. Lowers thoroughness; you decide if that panel matters for your use case. PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
Findings
Evidence-linked observations from this audit.
Purity reported at 92.861%
HPLC purity is within normal range for research peptides. Chromatogram shows clean single peak at ~2.5 minutes.
Identity confirmed by mass spectrometry
Mass spec data shows [M+H]+ ions at 375.93 and 857.93 m/z, consistent with peptide identification.
Lot number listed as N/A
No batch or lot number provided, which reduces traceability for quality control purposes.
Dates are reasonable
Received 2026-02-13, reported 2026-02-16 (3-day turnaround). Both dates are before today (2026-07-29).
Lab verification unclear
Freedom Diagnostics is listed with a searchable URL (FreedomDiagnosticsTesting.com), but independent verification of this lab's accreditation status is recommended.
Limited testing scope
Only identity and purity panels performed. No heavy metals, microbial, endotoxin, sterility, or residual solvent testing. This is common for basic research-grade testing but limits safety assurance.
Professional presentation
Document includes lab logo, chromatogram, mass spectrum, product photo, and chemist signature. Layout appears consistent with legitimate COA formatting.
PeptIQ COA reports analyze document content and publicly verifiable lab signals. They are educational and not a guarantee of product quality, legality, or safety. Always consult a qualified professional before making health decisions. We never publish purchase prices, shipping details, or uploader identity.