Public COA audit

NAD+

Audited July 28, 2026

Mostly consistent, with concerns

Several fields check out, but we found issues worth reviewing before you rely on this document.

Legitimacy
68
Confidence
82%
Panels
2/7
Purity (printed)
99.895%

Document details

Fields extracted from the certificate — not order or payment data.

Batch / lot
665394
Identity method
HPLC with UV Detection Coupled with Mass Spectrometry
Sample date
2026-04-06
Issue date
2026-04-07

7-panel checklist

Had data + good, had data + bad, reported without pass/fail, or missing. Missing lowers thoroughness — you decide whether that panel matters; PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.

2 of 7 present · 2 passed · 0 failed · 0 reported · 5 missing

Missing is a thoroughness gap — not automatically bad. PeptIQ’s legitimacy score still weighs panel coverage; you can down-weight panels that don’t matter for your use case.

  • Identity

    Tested · passed · core

    Compound identity confirmed (e.g. HPLC, mass spec).

    NAD+ confirmed via mass spectrometry ([M+H]+ 664.05, [M+2H]2+ 332.45)

  • Purity

    Tested · passed · core

    Reported purity percentage for the analyte.

    99.895%

  • Heavy metals

    Not on this COA

    Lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, or similar limits.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Microbial

    Not on this COA

    Bioburden / microbial limits testing.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Endotoxin

    Not on this COA · core

    LAL or chromogenic endotoxin assay.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Sterility

    Not on this COA

    Sterility testing where applicable.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Residual solvent / water

    Not on this COA

    Residual solvents or water content limits.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

How to read this

Had data · good

Panel present with a pass (or clear acceptance).

Had data · bad

Panel present with a fail — a concrete quality signal.

Had data · unclear

Value reported without an explicit pass/fail mark.

Missing

Not on this certificate. Lowers thoroughness; you decide if that panel matters for your use case. PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.

Findings

Evidence-linked observations from this audit.

  • High purity confirmed

    HPLC purity of 99.895% with clean chromatogram showing single dominant peak

  • Mass spectrometry confirmation

    MS data shows expected molecular ion peaks for NAD+ ([M+H]+ 664.05, [M+2H]2+ 332.45)

  • Lab verification unclear

    Freedom Diagnostics website and contact information provided, but independent verification of lab accreditation/credentials not immediately available from document

  • Limited testing scope

    Only identity and purity panels performed; no heavy metals, microbial, endotoxin, sterility, or residual solvent testing

  • Professional presentation with minor inconsistencies

    Document appears professionally formatted but includes placeholder text 'No Photo Requested' and 'TEST' labels that suggest template usage

  • Dates within normal range

    Received 2026-04-06, reported 2026-04-07 (one-day turnaround is fast but plausible for HPLC-MS analysis)

  • Batch information present

    Lot number 665394 clearly stated with net peptide content 457.58 mg

PeptIQ COA reports analyze document content and publicly verifiable lab signals. They are educational and not a guarantee of product quality, legality, or safety. Always consult a qualified professional before making health decisions. We never publish purchase prices, shipping details, or uploader identity.