Public COA audit
NAD+
Audited July 29, 2026
Several fields check out, but we found issues worth reviewing before you rely on this document.
- Legitimacy
- 92
- Confidence
- 88%
- Panels
- 2/7
- Purity (printed)
- 96.46%
Document details
Fields extracted from the certificate — not order or payment data.
- Batch / lot
- 10236
- Identity method
- HPLC-RTM
- Sample date
- 2026-06-21
- Issue date
- 2026-07-02
7-panel checklist
Had data + good, had data + bad, reported without pass/fail, or missing. Missing lowers thoroughness — you decide whether that panel matters; PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
2 of 7 present · 2 passed · 0 failed · 0 reported · 5 missing
Missing is a thoroughness gap — not automatically bad. PeptIQ’s legitimacy score still weighs panel coverage; you can down-weight panels that don’t matter for your use case.
Identity
Tested · passed · core
Compound identity confirmed (e.g. HPLC, mass spec).
Confirmed
Purity
Tested · passed · core
Reported purity percentage for the analyte.
96.46%
Heavy metals
Not on this COA
Lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, or similar limits.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Microbial
Not on this COA
Bioburden / microbial limits testing.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Endotoxin
Not on this COA · core
LAL or chromogenic endotoxin assay.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Sterility
Not on this COA
Sterility testing where applicable.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Residual solvent / water
Not on this COA
Residual solvents or water content limits.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
How to read this
Had data · good
Panel present with a pass (or clear acceptance).
Had data · bad
Panel present with a fail — a concrete quality signal.
Had data · unclear
Value reported without an explicit pass/fail mark.
Missing
Not on this certificate. Lowers thoroughness; you decide if that panel matters for your use case. PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
Findings
Evidence-linked observations from this audit.
HPLC purity meets specification
96.46% purity exceeds the >=95.0% specification. Net peptide content 507.61mg is close to labeled 500mg.
Identity confirmed by HPLC-RTM
NAD+ confirmed by chromatographic retention time comparison with reference standard.
Batch information complete
Lot number 10236, COA number COA-2026-TYZ-BN clearly stated.
Dates are logical and consistent
Date received 06/21/2026, analysis date 07/02/2026, issue date 7/2/2026. All dates are consistent and within expected timeframes.
Lab credentials present
ILS Laboratories, San Diego CA. ISO/IEC 17025 accreditation claimed. Verification URL and QR code provided (lab.ils-lab.com, access code YZJ4U683).
Limited testing panels
Only identity, purity, and fentanyl screening performed. No heavy metals, microbial, endotoxin, sterility, or residual solvent/water testing. This is common for basic research-grade testing but limits comprehensive quality assurance.
Professional presentation
Document includes HPLC chromatogram, lab director signature, ISO accreditation statement, and verification mechanisms. Formatting is consistent with professional laboratory reports.
PeptIQ COA reports analyze document content and publicly verifiable lab signals. They are educational and not a guarantee of product quality, legality, or safety. Always consult a qualified professional before making health decisions. We never publish purchase prices, shipping details, or uploader identity.