Public COA audit
NAD+
Audited July 29, 2026
Several fields check out, but we found issues worth reviewing before you rely on this document.
- Legitimacy
- 72
- Confidence
- 83%
- Panels
- 3/7
- Purity (printed)
- 99.07%
Document details
Fields extracted from the certificate — not order or payment data.
- Batch / lot
- ev8hxjz
- Identity method
- HPLC-UV-MS
- Sample date
- 2026-02-26
- Issue date
- 2026-03-03
7-panel checklist
Had data + good, had data + bad, reported without pass/fail, or missing. Missing lowers thoroughness — you decide whether that panel matters; PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
3 of 7 present · 2 passed · 0 failed · 1 reported · 4 missing
Missing is a thoroughness gap — not automatically bad. PeptIQ’s legitimacy score still weighs panel coverage; you can down-weight panels that don’t matter for your use case.
Identity
Tested · passed · core
Compound identity confirmed (e.g. HPLC, mass spec).
ID Confirmed
Purity
Tested · passed · core
Reported purity percentage for the analyte.
99.07%
Heavy metals
Not on this COA
Lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, or similar limits.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Microbial
Not on this COA
Bioburden / microbial limits testing.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Endotoxin
Tested · result on file · core
LAL or chromogenic endotoxin assay.
0.66 EU
Sterility
Not on this COA
Sterility testing where applicable.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Residual solvent / water
Not on this COA
Residual solvents or water content limits.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
How to read this
Had data · good
Panel present with a pass (or clear acceptance).
Had data · bad
Panel present with a fail — a concrete quality signal.
Had data · unclear
Value reported without an explicit pass/fail mark.
Missing
Not on this certificate. Lowers thoroughness; you decide if that panel matters for your use case. PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
Findings
Evidence-linked observations from this audit.
High HPLC purity
99.07% chromatographic purity is normal for research-grade NAD+ and is supported by clean chromatogram with dominant peak at 1.02 min
Mass spectral confirmation
ID confirmed via HPLC-UV-MS with reference spectrum provided on page 2
Batch/lot number present
Lot ev8hxjz clearly stated
Dates consistent
Sample received 2/26/2026, endotoxin test 2/28/2026, purity/identity tests 3/3/2026 - all logically sequenced and on or before 2026-07-29
Dual branding inconsistency
Document header shows 'Finnrick Analytics' and 'Finnrick.com' but footer and methods pages reference 'Krause Analytical LLC' with same Austin address. Unclear if this is a parent/subsidiary relationship or rebranding
Lab verification unclear
Verification URL https://finnrick.com/verify provided but cannot independently confirm Krause Analytical/Finnrick Analytics legitimacy or accreditation status from document alone
Limited testing scope
Only purity, identity, and endotoxin panels performed. No heavy metals, microbial count, sterility, or residual solvent testing. Methods summary mentions metals (USP 233) but no results reported
Professional presentation
Document includes detailed methods summary, chromatogram, mass spectrum comparison, and proper USP method references
PeptIQ COA reports analyze document content and publicly verifiable lab signals. They are educational and not a guarantee of product quality, legality, or safety. Always consult a qualified professional before making health decisions. We never publish purchase prices, shipping details, or uploader identity.