Public COA audit

NAD+

Audited July 29, 2026

Mostly consistent, with concerns

Several fields check out, but we found issues worth reviewing before you rely on this document.

Legitimacy
45
Confidence
85%
Panels
2/7

Document details

Fields extracted from the certificate — not order or payment data.

Batch / lot
WPNJ500P00043
Identity method
LC-MS
Sample date
2026-06-04
Issue date
2026-06-07

7-panel checklist

Had data + good, had data + bad, reported without pass/fail, or missing. Missing lowers thoroughness — you decide whether that panel matters; PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.

2 of 7 present · 0 passed · 1 failed · 1 reported · 5 missing

Missing is a thoroughness gap — not automatically bad. PeptIQ’s legitimacy score still weighs panel coverage; you can down-weight panels that don’t matter for your use case.

  • Identity

    Tested · failed · core

    Compound identity confirmed (e.g. HPLC, mass spec).

    No Analyte Detected

  • Purity

    Tested · result on file · core

    Reported purity percentage for the analyte.

    N/A

  • Heavy metals

    Not on this COA

    Lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, or similar limits.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Microbial

    Not on this COA

    Bioburden / microbial limits testing.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Endotoxin

    Not on this COA · core

    LAL or chromogenic endotoxin assay.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Sterility

    Not on this COA

    Sterility testing where applicable.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Residual solvent / water

    Not on this COA

    Residual solvents or water content limits.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

How to read this

Had data · good

Panel present with a pass (or clear acceptance).

Had data · bad

Panel present with a fail — a concrete quality signal.

Had data · unclear

Value reported without an explicit pass/fail mark.

Missing

Not on this certificate. Lowers thoroughness; you decide if that panel matters for your use case. PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.

Findings

Evidence-linked observations from this audit.

  • Identity Test Failed

    LC-MS analysis detected no analyte. The sample failed identity verification, indicating the product does not contain the claimed compound (NAD+).

  • Purity Not Determined

    HPLC-UV purity analysis returned N/A, likely because no target compound was detected to quantify.

  • Lab Verification Uncertain

    Freedom Diagnostics Testing appears to be a legitimate testing service, but independent verification of accreditation or third-party validation is recommended.

  • Limited Testing Scope

    Only identity and purity panels were performed. No heavy metals, microbial, endotoxin, sterility, or residual solvent testing was conducted.

  • Batch Number Present

    Lot number WPNJ500P00043 is clearly documented with accession number 2606040462.

  • Dates Documented

    Sample received 2026-06-04, reported 2026-06-07. Three-day turnaround is reasonable for LC-MS analysis.

  • Professional Presentation

    Document includes chromatogram, mass confirmation chart, signature, and standard disclaimer language consistent with research-grade testing.

PeptIQ COA reports analyze document content and publicly verifiable lab signals. They are educational and not a guarantee of product quality, legality, or safety. Always consult a qualified professional before making health decisions. We never publish purchase prices, shipping details, or uploader identity.