Public COA audit

NAD+

Audited July 28, 2026

Mostly consistent, with concerns

Several fields check out, but we found issues worth reviewing before you rely on this document.

Legitimacy
92
Confidence
88%
Panels
5/7
Purity (printed)
99.44%

Document details

Fields extracted from the certificate — not order or payment data.

Batch / lot
CR-NJ500-0309-1
Identity method
HPLC retention time comparison with reference standard
Sample date
2026-05-06
Issue date
2026-05-11

7-panel checklist

Had data + good, had data + bad, reported without pass/fail, or missing. Missing lowers thoroughness — you decide whether that panel matters; PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.

5 of 7 present · 5 passed · 0 failed · 0 reported · 2 missing

Missing is a thoroughness gap — not automatically bad. PeptIQ’s legitimacy score still weighs panel coverage; you can down-weight panels that don’t matter for your use case.

  • Identity

    Tested · passed · core

    Compound identity confirmed (e.g. HPLC, mass spec).

    Confirmed

  • Purity

    Tested · passed · core

    Reported purity percentage for the analyte.

    99.44%

  • Heavy metals

    Tested · passed

    Lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, or similar limits.

    All Not Detected

  • Microbial

    Not on this COA

    Bioburden / microbial limits testing.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Endotoxin

    Tested · passed · core

    LAL or chromogenic endotoxin assay.

    0.09 EU/mL

  • Sterility

    Tested · passed

    Sterility testing where applicable.

    No Growth

  • Residual solvent / water

    Not on this COA

    Residual solvents or water content limits.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

How to read this

Had data · good

Panel present with a pass (or clear acceptance).

Had data · bad

Panel present with a fail — a concrete quality signal.

Had data · unclear

Value reported without an explicit pass/fail mark.

Missing

Not on this certificate. Lowers thoroughness; you decide if that panel matters for your use case. PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.

Findings

Evidence-linked observations from this audit.

  • High purity confirmed

    99.44% purity by HPLC with conformity testing across 3 samples (mean 99.39%, std dev 0.051%), all passing ≥95% specification

  • Identity confirmed

    NAD+ confirmed by HPLC retention time comparison with reference standard across all 3 conformity samples

  • Batch information complete

    Lot CR-NJ500-0309-1, Accession ACC-2026-2070, COA COA-2026-SG7_J9 with access code PQD6GXYS

  • Dates consistent

    Received 2026-05-06, analyzed and issued 2026-05-11 (5-day turnaround)

  • Lab credentials present

    ILS Laboratories, San Diego CA, ISO/IEC 17025 accredited, signed by Dr. Greg Kalyuzhny (Lab Director), verification URL and QR code provided

  • Comprehensive testing

    Full QC Panel includes purity/identity (HPLC), heavy metals (ICP-MS), sterility (PCR), and endotoxin (USP <85>). Missing: microbial count and residual solvents/water content

  • Microbial panel absent

    No microbial enumeration (TAMC/TYMC) testing reported, only sterility PCR

  • Residual solvents/water not tested

    No Karl Fischer water content or residual solvent analysis reported

  • Professional presentation

    Clean layout, HPLC chromatogram included, conformity testing with statistics, detailed methodology notes

PeptIQ COA reports analyze document content and publicly verifiable lab signals. They are educational and not a guarantee of product quality, legality, or safety. Always consult a qualified professional before making health decisions. We never publish purchase prices, shipping details, or uploader identity.