Public COA audit

MOTS-C · MS 40

Audited July 29, 2026

Evidence suggests fabrication

Multiple signals on this document conflict with known lab formats or verification patterns.

Legitimacy
15
Confidence
88%
Panels
2/7
Purity (printed)
99%

Document details

Fields extracted from the certificate — not order or payment data.

Batch / lot
Batch number field present but illegible/redacted
Identity method
HPLC with linear gradient in H20 and Acetonitrile with 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid
Sample date
2026-05-04

7-panel checklist

Had data + good, had data + bad, reported without pass/fail, or missing. Missing lowers thoroughness — you decide whether that panel matters; PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.

2 of 7 present · 2 passed · 0 failed · 0 reported · 5 missing

Missing is a thoroughness gap — not automatically bad. PeptIQ’s legitimacy score still weighs panel coverage; you can down-weight panels that don’t matter for your use case.

  • Identity

    Tested · passed · core

    Compound identity confirmed (e.g. HPLC, mass spec).

    39.49mg content confirmed by HPLC

  • Purity

    Tested · passed · core

    Reported purity percentage for the analyte.

    99%

  • Heavy metals

    Not on this COA

    Lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, or similar limits.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Microbial

    Not on this COA

    Bioburden / microbial limits testing.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Endotoxin

    Not on this COA · core

    LAL or chromogenic endotoxin assay.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Sterility

    Not on this COA

    Sterility testing where applicable.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Residual solvent / water

    Not on this COA

    Residual solvents or water content limits.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

How to read this

Had data · good

Panel present with a pass (or clear acceptance).

Had data · bad

Panel present with a fail — a concrete quality signal.

Had data · unclear

Value reported without an explicit pass/fail mark.

Missing

Not on this certificate. Lowers thoroughness; you decide if that panel matters for your use case. PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.

Findings

Evidence-linked observations from this audit.

  • Large watermark obscures document

    Prominent 'MADSEN AKADEMIE' watermark repeated across entire document reduces professional appearance and readability, atypical for legitimate laboratory reports

  • Suspicious laboratory entity

    Madsen Akademie / Analiza Białek sp. z o.o. does not appear in standard directories of accredited peptide testing laboratories. No accreditation marks (ISO 17025, GMP, etc.) visible. Company registration details provided but no verification possible from document

  • Non-standard COA format

    Document layout and presentation style differs significantly from established peptide testing laboratories. Includes product photo with barcode which is unusual for analytical COAs

  • Limited testing scope

    Only identity and purity testing performed. No heavy metals, microbial, endotoxin, sterility, or residual solvent testing. While not automatically disqualifying, this is minimal for research peptides

  • No mass spectrometry confirmation

    Identity confirmed only by HPLC retention time and content weight. No MS, NMR, or amino acid analysis provided for structural confirmation of MOTS-C peptide

  • Batch number illegible

    Batch number field appears redacted or illegible, making traceability difficult

  • Dates within acceptable range

    Receive date 2026-04-30, Start date 2026-05-04, End date 2026-05-08 are all on or before current date 2026-07-29 and show reasonable testing timeline

  • Purity value reasonable

    99% purity by HPLC is within normal range for research peptides and not suspicious by itself

PeptIQ COA reports analyze document content and publicly verifiable lab signals. They are educational and not a guarantee of product quality, legality, or safety. Always consult a qualified professional before making health decisions. We never publish purchase prices, shipping details, or uploader identity.