Public COA audit
MOTS-C
Audited July 29, 2026
Multiple signals on this document conflict with known lab formats or verification patterns.
- Legitimacy
- 15
- Confidence
- 88%
- Panels
- 2/7
- Purity (printed)
- 99%
Document details
Fields extracted from the certificate — not order or payment data.
- Identity method
- HPLC with reference chromatogram comparison
- Sample date
- 2026-02-23
- Issue date
- 2026-02-09
7-panel checklist
Had data + good, had data + bad, reported without pass/fail, or missing. Missing lowers thoroughness — you decide whether that panel matters; PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
2 of 7 present · 2 passed · 0 failed · 0 reported · 5 missing
Missing is a thoroughness gap — not automatically bad. PeptIQ’s legitimacy score still weighs panel coverage; you can down-weight panels that don’t matter for your use case.
Identity
Tested · passed · core
Compound identity confirmed (e.g. HPLC, mass spec).
Peak matched reference chromatogram
Purity
Tested · passed · core
Reported purity percentage for the analyte.
99%
Heavy metals
Not on this COA
Lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, or similar limits.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Microbial
Not on this COA
Bioburden / microbial limits testing.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Endotoxin
Not on this COA · core
LAL or chromogenic endotoxin assay.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Sterility
Not on this COA
Sterility testing where applicable.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Residual solvent / water
Not on this COA
Residual solvents or water content limits.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
How to read this
Had data · good
Panel present with a pass (or clear acceptance).
Had data · bad
Panel present with a fail — a concrete quality signal.
Had data · unclear
Value reported without an explicit pass/fail mark.
Missing
Not on this certificate. Lowers thoroughness; you decide if that panel matters for your use case. PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
Findings
Evidence-linked observations from this audit.
Known fraudulent template
This document uses the 'Madsen Akademie' template with 'MADSEN AKADEMIE' watermark, which has been identified in multiple fraudulent COAs. The layout, watermarking style, and presentation are consistent with known fake documents.
Suspicious lab entity
The document lists multiple overlapping entities: 'Madsen Akademie' (client and header), 'Laboratory of Analysis' (header), and 'Analiza Białek sp. z o.o.' (footer). This mixing of names is atypical for legitimate testing laboratories and suggests fabrication.
Illogical date sequence
The 'Receive date' (2026-02-09) is listed BEFORE the 'Start date' (2026-02-23), which is impossible. A sample cannot be analyzed before it is received. This is a clear fabrication error.
Missing batch number
The batch number field shows dashes ('-----') instead of an actual lot/batch identifier, which is unusual for a legitimate COA and makes traceability impossible.
Unprofessional presentation
The document has numerous formatting issues: large watermarks obscuring text, inconsistent branding, and a photo of a vial with a barcode that appears staged rather than documentary. Professional labs typically provide cleaner, more standardized reports.
Limited testing scope
Only identity and purity testing performed. No heavy metals, microbial, endotoxin, sterility, or residual solvent testing. While not automatically disqualifying, this is minimal for peptide quality assurance.
Unverifiable laboratory
No website, accreditation information, or verification URL provided. The KRS, NIP, and REGON numbers listed cannot be independently verified as belonging to a legitimate analytical laboratory.
PeptIQ COA reports analyze document content and publicly verifiable lab signals. They are educational and not a guarantee of product quality, legality, or safety. Always consult a qualified professional before making health decisions. We never publish purchase prices, shipping details, or uploader identity.