Public COA audit

MOTS-c

Audited July 29, 2026

Mostly consistent, with concerns

Several fields check out, but we found issues worth reviewing before you rely on this document.

Legitimacy
88
Confidence
92%
Panels
2/7
Purity (printed)
98%

Document details

Fields extracted from the certificate — not order or payment data.

Batch / lot
wjyn67f
Identity method
HPLC-UV-MS
Sample date
2026-04-07
Issue date
2026-04-28

7-panel checklist

Had data + good, had data + bad, reported without pass/fail, or missing. Missing lowers thoroughness — you decide whether that panel matters; PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.

2 of 7 present · 2 passed · 0 failed · 0 reported · 5 missing

Missing is a thoroughness gap — not automatically bad. PeptIQ’s legitimacy score still weighs panel coverage; you can down-weight panels that don’t matter for your use case.

  • Identity

    Tested · passed · core

    Compound identity confirmed (e.g. HPLC, mass spec).

    ID Confirmed

  • Purity

    Tested · passed · core

    Reported purity percentage for the analyte.

    98.0%

  • Heavy metals

    Not on this COA

    Lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, or similar limits.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Microbial

    Not on this COA

    Bioburden / microbial limits testing.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Endotoxin

    Not on this COA · core

    LAL or chromogenic endotoxin assay.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Sterility

    Not on this COA

    Sterility testing where applicable.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Residual solvent / water

    Not on this COA

    Residual solvents or water content limits.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

How to read this

Had data · good

Panel present with a pass (or clear acceptance).

Had data · bad

Panel present with a fail — a concrete quality signal.

Had data · unclear

Value reported without an explicit pass/fail mark.

Missing

Not on this certificate. Lowers thoroughness; you decide if that panel matters for your use case. PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.

Findings

Evidence-linked observations from this audit.

  • High chromatographic purity

    98.0% purity by HPLC-UV/MS is within normal range for research peptides

  • Identity confirmed

    Mass spectral match confirmed by HPLC-UV-MS with CAS 1627580-64-6

  • Label claim met

    99.1% of label claim (9.91 mg vs 10 mg claimed)

  • Batch/lot number present

    wjyn67f

  • Dates consistent

    Sample received 2026-04-07, tested 2026-04-17, report issued 2026-04-28 - all dates are logical and sequential

  • Lab identification clear

    Krause Analytical LLC, Austin TX, with director signature and verification URL provided

  • Limited testing panels

    Only identity and purity panels performed; endotoxin and heavy metals methods described but no results shown; microbial, sterility, and residual solvent testing not performed

  • Professional presentation

    Multi-page report with chromatogram, mass spectrum, and detailed methods summary; consistent branding and formatting

PeptIQ COA reports analyze document content and publicly verifiable lab signals. They are educational and not a guarantee of product quality, legality, or safety. Always consult a qualified professional before making health decisions. We never publish purchase prices, shipping details, or uploader identity.