Public COA audit

Melanotan 1 · Melanotan I

Audited July 28, 2026

Mostly consistent, with concerns

Several fields check out, but we found issues worth reviewing before you rely on this document.

Legitimacy
72
Confidence
83%
Panels
2/7
Purity (printed)
99.38%

Document details

Fields extracted from the certificate — not order or payment data.

Identity method
LC-MS with UV detection
Sample date
2025-03-20
Issue date
2025-03-27

7-panel checklist

Had data + good, had data + bad, reported without pass/fail, or missing. Missing lowers thoroughness — you decide whether that panel matters; PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.

2 of 7 present · 2 passed · 0 failed · 0 reported · 5 missing

Missing is a thoroughness gap — not automatically bad. PeptIQ’s legitimacy score still weighs panel coverage; you can down-weight panels that don’t matter for your use case.

  • Identity

    Tested · passed · core

    Compound identity confirmed (e.g. HPLC, mass spec).

    Melanotan 1

  • Purity

    Tested · passed · core

    Reported purity percentage for the analyte.

    99.38%

  • Heavy metals

    Not on this COA

    Lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, or similar limits.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Microbial

    Not on this COA

    Bioburden / microbial limits testing.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Endotoxin

    Not on this COA · core

    LAL or chromogenic endotoxin assay.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Sterility

    Not on this COA

    Sterility testing where applicable.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Residual solvent / water

    Not on this COA

    Residual solvents or water content limits.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

How to read this

Had data · good

Panel present with a pass (or clear acceptance).

Had data · bad

Panel present with a fail — a concrete quality signal.

Had data · unclear

Value reported without an explicit pass/fail mark.

Missing

Not on this certificate. Lowers thoroughness; you decide if that panel matters for your use case. PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.

Findings

Evidence-linked observations from this audit.

  • High purity achieved

    99.38% purity exceeds specification of >98%, consistent with quality research-grade peptide

  • Identity confirmed

    Compound identity confirmed as Melanotan 1 via LC-MS with UV detection, includes PubChem reference CID 16154396

  • Missing batch/lot number

    Batch/Lot # field is present but blank, making traceability difficult

  • Dates are reasonable

    Sample received 03/20/25, analysis conducted 03/27/25 - 7 day turnaround is normal

  • Lab verification uncertain

    BioRegen presents as independent testing lab with verification URL (bioregen.com/verify) and QR code, but independent verification of lab credentials not performed

  • Limited testing scope

    Only identity and purity panels present; no heavy metals, microbial, endotoxin, sterility, or residual solvent testing performed

  • Professional presentation

    Document includes chromatograms, mass spectra, professional layout, analyst signature, and security features (QR code, security key)

Timing & next steps

Practical follow-ups based on document age and gaps.

  • coa age

    This COA was issued over a year ago (488 days) — consider whether a retest is warranted for this batch.

PeptIQ COA reports analyze document content and publicly verifiable lab signals. They are educational and not a guarantee of product quality, legality, or safety. Always consult a qualified professional before making health decisions. We never publish purchase prices, shipping details, or uploader identity.