Public COA audit
SS-31
Audited July 29, 2026
Several fields check out, but we found issues worth reviewing before you rely on this document.
- Legitimacy
- 88
- Confidence
- 92%
- Panels
- 1/7
Document details
Fields extracted from the certificate — not order or payment data.
- Batch / lot
- SS202602
- Issue date
- 2026-04-01
7-panel checklist
Had data + good, had data + bad, reported without pass/fail, or missing. Missing lowers thoroughness — you decide whether that panel matters; PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
1 of 7 present · 1 passed · 0 failed · 0 reported · 6 missing
Missing is a thoroughness gap — not automatically bad. PeptIQ’s legitimacy score still weighs panel coverage; you can down-weight panels that don’t matter for your use case.
Identity
Not on this COA · core
Compound identity confirmed (e.g. HPLC, mass spec).
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Purity
Not on this COA · core
Reported purity percentage for the analyte.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Heavy metals
Tested · passed
Lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, or similar limits.
Pb <0.5 ppm, As <0.12 ppm, Cd <0.07 ppm, Hg <0.4 ppm
Microbial
Not on this COA
Bioburden / microbial limits testing.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Endotoxin
Not on this COA · core
LAL or chromogenic endotoxin assay.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Sterility
Not on this COA
Sterility testing where applicable.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Residual solvent / water
Not on this COA
Residual solvents or water content limits.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
How to read this
Had data · good
Panel present with a pass (or clear acceptance).
Had data · bad
Panel present with a fail — a concrete quality signal.
Had data · unclear
Value reported without an explicit pass/fail mark.
Missing
Not on this certificate. Lowers thoroughness; you decide if that panel matters for your use case. PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
Findings
Evidence-linked observations from this audit.
Heavy metals panel complete
ICP-MS analysis for Pb, As, Cd, Hg with spike recovery validation. All elements pass acceptance limits. Method suitability confirmed with recoveries 99-107%.
Limited scope - heavy metals only
This is a specialized heavy metals analysis report, not a full COA. No identity, purity, microbial, endotoxin, sterility, or solvent panels present. This is typical for supplemental testing but incomplete for comprehensive peptide characterization.
Professional lab presentation
Kovera Labs report with verification URL (koveralabs.com/verify), sample ID KVR-2026-62476E, access code 13534D. Includes QC analyst (Maya Quinn, B.S.) and Quality Director (David Cohen, M.S.) authorization.
Analysis date documented
Analysis date April 01, 2026 is clearly stated and within acceptable range relative to current date 2026-07-29.
Batch information present
Lot/Batch SS202602 documented. Product identified as SS-31 (lyophilized, research use raw material).
Professional formatting and QC details
Report includes method blank pass, CCV pass, duplicate RPD <14%. Spike recovery data provided for all four elements with acceptance criteria 70-150%.
PeptIQ COA reports analyze document content and publicly verifiable lab signals. They are educational and not a guarantee of product quality, legality, or safety. Always consult a qualified professional before making health decisions. We never publish purchase prices, shipping details, or uploader identity.