Public COA audit
SS-31
Audited July 29, 2026
Several fields check out, but we found issues worth reviewing before you rely on this document.
- Legitimacy
- 72
- Confidence
- 85%
- Panels
- 2/7
Document details
Fields extracted from the certificate — not order or payment data.
- Batch / lot
- SS202601
- Issue date
- 2026-04-10
7-panel checklist
Had data + good, had data + bad, reported without pass/fail, or missing. Missing lowers thoroughness — you decide whether that panel matters; PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
2 of 7 present · 2 passed · 0 failed · 0 reported · 5 missing
Missing is a thoroughness gap — not automatically bad. PeptIQ’s legitimacy score still weighs panel coverage; you can down-weight panels that don’t matter for your use case.
Identity
Not on this COA · core
Compound identity confirmed (e.g. HPLC, mass spec).
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Purity
Not on this COA · core
Reported purity percentage for the analyte.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Heavy metals
Not on this COA
Lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, or similar limits.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Microbial
Tested · passed
Bioburden / microbial limits testing.
No Growth (Bacteria), Not Detected (Fungi/Yeast)
Endotoxin
Not on this COA · core
LAL or chromogenic endotoxin assay.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Sterility
Tested · passed
Sterility testing where applicable.
No microbial growth detected
Residual solvent / water
Not on this COA
Residual solvents or water content limits.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
How to read this
Had data · good
Panel present with a pass (or clear acceptance).
Had data · bad
Panel present with a fail — a concrete quality signal.
Had data · unclear
Value reported without an explicit pass/fail mark.
Missing
Not on this certificate. Lowers thoroughness; you decide if that panel matters for your use case. PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
Findings
Evidence-linked observations from this audit.
Date Received After Date Certified
Date Certified is listed as 04/10/2026, but Date Received is 04/12/2026. The sample cannot be certified before it is received. This is a logical impossibility that suggests data entry error or document fabrication.
Limited Testing Scope
This is a sterility screening report only. It does not include identity confirmation, purity analysis, heavy metals, endotoxin, or residual solvent testing. While legitimate for its stated purpose (rapid sterility screen), it is not a comprehensive COA.
Rapid Screening Method Disclaimer
The report explicitly states this is a preliminary screening method suitable for quality control purposes, and that full USP <71> sterility testing may be required for regulatory compliance. This is a limited-scope test, not a full sterility validation.
No Verification URL or Lab Contact Information
The report includes an access code (030E88) and QR code but no URL, phone number, or address for Kovera Labs. Independent verification of the lab's existence and this report's authenticity is not possible from the document alone.
Professional Presentation
The document has professional formatting, clear test parameters, and appropriate disclaimers about the limitations of rapid screening methods.
PeptIQ COA reports analyze document content and publicly verifiable lab signals. They are educational and not a guarantee of product quality, legality, or safety. Always consult a qualified professional before making health decisions. We never publish purchase prices, shipping details, or uploader identity.