Public COA audit
SS-31
Audited July 29, 2026
Several fields check out, but we found issues worth reviewing before you rely on this document.
- Legitimacy
- 72
- Confidence
- 85%
- Panels
- 1/7
Document details
Fields extracted from the certificate — not order or payment data.
- Batch / lot
- SS202601
- Issue date
- 2026-04-02
7-panel checklist
Had data + good, had data + bad, reported without pass/fail, or missing. Missing lowers thoroughness — you decide whether that panel matters; PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
1 of 7 present · 1 passed · 0 failed · 0 reported · 6 missing
Missing is a thoroughness gap — not automatically bad. PeptIQ’s legitimacy score still weighs panel coverage; you can down-weight panels that don’t matter for your use case.
Identity
Not on this COA · core
Compound identity confirmed (e.g. HPLC, mass spec).
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Purity
Not on this COA · core
Reported purity percentage for the analyte.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Heavy metals
Tested · passed
Lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, or similar limits.
Pb <0.7 ppm, As <0.12 ppm, Cd <0.03 ppm, Hg <0.4 ppm
Microbial
Not on this COA
Bioburden / microbial limits testing.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Endotoxin
Not on this COA · core
LAL or chromogenic endotoxin assay.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Sterility
Not on this COA
Sterility testing where applicable.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Residual solvent / water
Not on this COA
Residual solvents or water content limits.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
How to read this
Had data · good
Panel present with a pass (or clear acceptance).
Had data · bad
Panel present with a fail — a concrete quality signal.
Had data · unclear
Value reported without an explicit pass/fail mark.
Missing
Not on this certificate. Lowers thoroughness; you decide if that panel matters for your use case. PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
Findings
Evidence-linked observations from this audit.
Incomplete testing panel
This report only covers heavy metals analysis (ICP-MS). No identity confirmation (HPLC/MS), purity assessment, microbial testing, endotoxin, sterility, or residual solvent/water content panels are present. This is a partial COA covering only elemental impurities.
Lab verification needed
Kovera Labs is listed with verification URL koveralabs.com/verify and access code BC6F33. Independent verification of this lab's accreditation and the specific sample ID KVR-2026-030E88 is recommended.
Analysis date within acceptable range
Analysis date of April 02, 2026 is before the current date (2026-07-29) and represents a reasonable timeframe for testing.
Heavy metals testing comprehensive
ICP-MS analysis for Pb, As, Cd, Hg with spike recovery validation (98-104%) and quality control metrics (method blank, CCV, duplicate RPD <11%) all within acceptable ranges. All four elements pass stated acceptance limits.
Professional presentation
Document shows professional formatting with clear methodology, results tables, spike recovery validation, QC metrics, and lab director authorization. Includes sample ID and access code for verification.
No purity or identity data
This report does not include HPLC purity percentage or identity confirmation (MS, NMR). For peptide research use, identity and purity testing are typically essential components of a complete COA.
PeptIQ COA reports analyze document content and publicly verifiable lab signals. They are educational and not a guarantee of product quality, legality, or safety. Always consult a qualified professional before making health decisions. We never publish purchase prices, shipping details, or uploader identity.